7749 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Snail Darters and Pork Barrels Revisited 73 v. Block, 635 F. Supp. 163 (D. Mont. 1986), rev'd on other grounds, 840 F. 2d 714 (9th Cir. 1988); NWF v. National Park Service, 669 F. Supp. 384 (D. Wyo. 1988). 19. Sierra Club v. Clark, 755 F. 2d 608 (8th Cir. 1985). 20. Defenders of Wildlife v. Andrus, 428 F. Supp. 167 (D.D.C. 1977). 21. National Wildli fe Federation v. Hodel, 23 ERC 1089 (E.D. Cal. 1985); California Fish and Game Comm'n v. Hode1,18 ELR 20141(E.D. Cal. 1987). 22. Defenders of Wildlife v. Administrator, 688 F. Supp. 1334 (D. Minn. 1988), aff'd in part, 882 F. 2d 1294 (9th Cir. 1989). 23. But compare Connor v. Andrus, 453 F. Supp. 1037 (W.D. Tex.1978). 24. 12 ERC 1156 (D. Neb. 1978). 25. Riverside Irrigation District v. Andrews, 758 F. 2d 508 (10th Cir. 1985). See the essay by Dan Tarlock in Part III of this volume. 26. Carson-Truckee Water Conservation District v. Clark, 741 F. 2d 257 (9th Cir. 19$4), cert. denied, 105 U.S. 1482 (1985). 27. Sierra Club v. Lyng, 694 F. Supp. 1260 (E.D. Tex. 1988), appeal pending. 28. See Portland Audubon Society v. Hodel, 866 F. 2d 302 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 109 S. Ct. 3229 (1989), on remand, 884 F. 2d 1233 (9th Cir. 1989). 29. In Northern Spotted Owl v. Hodel, 716 F. Supp. 479 (D. Wash. 1988), the court held that the FWS acted arbitrarily in refusing to list the owl as endangered or threatened in light of the available scientific evidence of the species' status. See Public Land News, March 30, 1989, p. 1. 30. The case, currently on appeal, involves primarily questions of mu- nicipal finance. 31. Protect Our Eagles' Trees (Poets) v. City o f Lawrence, 715 F. Supp. 996 (D. Kans. 1989). 32. I can never remember whether that is the credit or debit side. 33. See Goggins (1990, § 15.05 [4]): References Bean, Michael. 1977. The Evolution o f National Wildlife Law. New York: Praeger. Chase, Alston. 1986. Playing God in Yellowstone. Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press.