My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7749
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7749
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:19:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7749
Author
Kohm, K. A., ed.
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1991
Copyright Material
YES
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
72 REFLECTIODIS ON THE ACT <br />so I will confine myself to my favorite sources. The reader who is so <br />inclined may consult the more detailed treatments of the subjects <br />briefly alluded to in these citations. <br />1. In Genesis, God commanded Man to assert dominion "over every <br />thing that moves." This injunction has been observed much more <br />closely than other biblical lessons. <br />2. 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1543 (1982). <br />3. 16 U.S.C. §§703-711 (1982). <br />4. 16 U.S.C. §668 (1982). <br />5. For example, 16 U.S.C. §§528-531 (1982); 43 U.S.C. §§1701-1784 <br />(1982). See generally Goggins and Wilkinson (1987). <br />6. See, for example, Perkins v. Bergland, 608 F. 2d 803 (9th Cir. 1979); <br />see also Coggins (1982). <br />7. See Coggins (1990.) <br />8. I confine my attention to mechanisms for the conservation of en- <br />dangered and threatened species of wildlife and plants on the fed- <br />eral public lands not because developments on federal lands are <br />more important than elsewhere, but rather because I am more <br />familiar with the disputes in this sphere. <br />9. For example, Defenders of Wildlife v. Andrus, 11 ERC 2098 and 455 <br />F. Supp. 446 (D.D.C. 1978); see Bean (1977, p. 138). <br />10. See, for example, Sierra Club v. Lyng, 694 F. Supp. 1260, 1268 (E.D. <br />Tex. 1988), appeal pending; Wilkinson (1984). <br />11. Cabinet Mountains Wilderness v. Peterson, 685 F. 2d 678 (D.C. Cir. <br />1982). <br />12. Foundation for North American Wild Sheep v. United States, 681 F. <br />2d 1172 (9th Cir. 1982). <br />13. TVA v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (1978). <br />14. Thomas v. Peterson, 753 F. 2d 754 (9th Cir. 1985). <br />15. Connor v. Andrus, 836 F. 2d 1521 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 109 S. <br />Ct. 1121 (1989); Rob Marshall Alliance v. Hodel, 852 F. 2d 1233 (9th <br />Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 109 S. Ct. 1340 (1989). <br />16. Sierra Club v. Marsh, 816 F. 2d 1376 (9th Cir. 1987); but compare <br />Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council, 109 S. Ct. 1835 (1989). <br />17. New England Naturalist Assn v. Larsen, 692 F. Supp. 75 (D.R.I. <br />1988); Carson-Truckee Water Conservation District v. Clark, 741 F. <br />2d 257 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 105 S. Ct. 1482 (1985). <br />18. Wilson v. Block, 708 F. 2d 735, 747-51 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 464 <br />U.S. 956 (1983); Enos v. Marsh, 769 F. 2d 1363 (9th Cir. 1985); Vance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.