Laserfiche WebLink
LIFE IN JEOPARDY Ol~I <br />PRIVATE PROPERTY <br />by <br />HOLMES ROLSTON III <br />THE ENDAAIGERED SPECIES ACT Of 1973 1S One Of the mOSt eXClt- <br />ing measures ever to be passed by the U.S. Congress, perhaps to <br />be passed by any nation. On the surface, the act might seem <br />analogous to other environmental legislation-about clean air, <br />soil, and water or timber and range management-in that it <br />protects people from harm done by other people. But the Endan- <br />gered Species Act, which indeed protects people from harm, <br />mandates protecting nonhuman species, whooping cranes and <br />whorled pogonias. The U.S. Supreme Court, interpreting the <br />act, insisted that "Congress-intended endangered species to be <br />afforded the highest of priorities, ...and that the plain intent of <br />Congress in enacting this statute was to halt and reverse the <br />trend toward species extinction, whatever the cost."' <br />Implementing this legislation has proved to deepen our range <br />of moral concern-more so, perhaps, than Congress and the <br />original supporters of the act expected. We have to ask, "What is <br />it about species that is of value?"And that takes us deeper into a <br />concept of natural value than does most natural resource legis- <br />lation, past the usual economic and utilitarian values attached <br />to natural resources. The act values rare species in nontradi- <br />tional and hitherto unstated ways. It challenges property rights <br />with a higher priority afforded to endangered species. But more <br />than that, past even a deep humanistic concern, we have to ask <br />43 <br />