My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7749
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7749
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:19:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7749
Author
Kohm, K. A., ed.
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1991
Copyright Material
YES
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
42 REFLECTIONS ON THE ACT <br />statistics so often cited to show that, since Tellico Dam, there <br />have been virtually no conflicts between endangered species <br />needs and development desires. <br />Political pressures and the necessity to accommodate at least <br />some of them may well be inevitable in any program with regu- <br />latory consequences. The danger inherent in such accommoda- <br />tions, however, is that if they are made too easily and too often, <br />they create a perception that the agency charged with adminis- <br />tering the program is willing to abandon its basic duties to <br />escape political heat. This perception, in turn, emboldens still <br />others to pressure the agency for even more concessions. It is <br />this dilemma that now confronts the Fish and Wildlife Service <br />and the federal endangered species program. It is, at bottom, the <br />reason why a handful of senators for three years blocked Senate <br />consideration of legislation to reauthorize the Endangered Spe- <br />cies Act over issues of no immediate importance to the vast <br />majority of the Senate. <br />The challenge for the endangered species program in its next <br />fifteen years, and particularly during the current administra- <br />tion, will be to restore the perception that decisions in the pro- <br />gram are in fact being made on the basis of the scientific criteria <br />that the law demands rather than in response to political pres- <br />sures. To restore that perception, the Fish and Wildlife Service <br />and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration <br />must be led by dedicated figures who are broadly experienced in <br />the management and conservation of living resources, strong in <br />their conviction that it is the job of these. agencies to base their <br />decisions on the best scientific data available, determined to <br />seek the increased budgetary resources needed for an effective <br />endangered species program, and widely regarded as having <br />unquestioned integrity. <br />Today, the first member of a new generation of California con- <br />dors sees a world of bright lights, human faces, and .cage bars. <br />Whether it and others that may follow will ever again see a world <br />of rugged mountains, distant horizons, and open skies depends <br />upon how committed the stewards of the endangered species <br />program are to achieving those ends. For the condor, that com- <br />mitment appears to exist. For the success of the endangered spe- <br />cies program, no less a commitment must be-made for the many <br />other plants and animals whose very survival is at stake. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.