Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY (Continued) <br />• <br /> Summary Table 2 <br />Comparison of alternative plans ___ ____ <br />Alternatives _______ _.___ <br /> Existing No <br /> condition action A B <br />__ ---`__-__-_ _ _ __-_-__ <br /> <br />Canal lining (miles) - _ <br />- <br />-2-C--------- <br />_ NC ---- -------- <br />- 31-+38 <br />_ - <br />----~ +38 <br />Lateral lining (miles) NC +308 <br />Lateral piping (miles) +308 <br />Temporary rights-of-way (acres) <br />Private land 1,667 1,667 <br />Federal land 1,091 1,091 <br />Permanent rights-of-way (acres) <br />Private land 4/1,409 NC +1,665 +1,665 <br />Federal land NC +311 +311 <br />Wildlife habitat (acres) <br />Marsh 2,360 -60 -471 -471 <br />Shrubland 17,147 -410 -2,239 -2,239 <br />Acquired habitat 5/ 6/+2,090 6/+2,090 <br />Desert water developments NC +6 +6 <br />Endangered species habitat/ NC NC NC <br />Cultural resource sites present 82 82 82 82 <br />Salt loading reduction (tons)8/ NC 138,000 143,500 <br />Seepage reduction (acre-feet) <br />Irrigation systems NC 39,500 41,400 <br />Gravity pressure No No No Yes <br />Improved system No No Yes Yes <br />Reduction in administrative water <br />available for other uses No No No Yes <br />Reduction in ground water and al- <br />kali deposits No No Yes Yes <br />Peak employment increases (jobs) NC +1,163 +1,050 <br />Construction costs (1984 prices) 175,070,000 192,080,000 <br />Increase in annual operation, main- <br />tenance and replacement costs 444,000 444,000 1,660,000 716,000 <br />Cost <br />effectiveness ($/ton) __91_ ____ ___ __89 <br />_ <br />1/ Plusses indicate increases, ____ <br />minuses indicate _ __ __ <br />decreases, and figures without parameters <br />are those presently existing. <br />2/ NC No significant change. <br />3/ Does not include a mile-long siphon under Ea st Salt Creek. <br />4/ Includes some Federal lands. <br />5/ Wildlife measures for Stage One would be imp lemented under the no-action al ternative. <br />These measures represent approximatel y 10 percent of the total wild life plan for the ~Grand Val- <br />ley Unit. <br />6/ Total for Grand Valley Unit (Stage One plus Stage Two). <br />7/ Wildlife management areas wo uld benefit the bald eagle wit h development of alternatives <br />A or B. <br />8/ Does not consider the potent ial to reduce sa lt loading by 133,000 tons by t he on-farm <br />salinity control program of the U.S. Department of Ag riculture. <br /> <br />S-13 <br />