My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7316
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7316
Author
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Title
Redlands Dam Fishway Feasibility Study, Gunnison River, Colorado.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Walla Walla.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(b) Also, some maintenance of mechanical equipment <br />(valves, slide gates, fish hoist) is required intermittently to keep <br />these items in proper working order. <br />5. Estimate of Costs. <br />a. Table 3, Estimate, Alternate No. 2, presents the <br />materials and installation costs of the fish ladder and bar screen. At <br />the feasibility study level, a contingency factor of 25 percent is added <br />to the materials and installation costs to account for the uncertainty of <br />a feasibility level study. An additional 20 percent has been added to <br />the construction estimate to account for engineering and design, construe- <br />tion supervision and administration, engineering during construction, <br />site geologic explorations, topographic surveys, and miscellaneous costs. <br />The total job cost for Alternate No. 2 is $410,300. <br />b. This alternate would be abandoned or salvaged if fish <br />.passage testing proved unsuccessful. However, if testing was successful, <br />the replacement costs for the full-size ladder would be similar to <br />Alternate No. 1. Also, the approximate cost of completing the ladder <br />construction would be $550,000. The total cost of two-phase construction <br />is approximately $120,000 more than building Alternate No. 1 in one <br />construction season. <br />E. Alternate No. 3. <br />1. Description of Major Features. <br />a. This alternate closely relates to the combination of <br />preliminary alternates B and G described previously. This vertical slot/ <br />orifice ladder located on the right bank has a downstream and a side <br />entrance. From the entrance, the ladder climbs 23 pools to the forebay <br />exit. The exit is located approximately 35 feet upstream from the <br />existing dam crest, This ladder also has a floor slope of 1 foot ver- <br />tical to 20 feet horizontal and has provisions to adjust the length and <br />number of pools. The pool length is adjusted by placing or removing <br />lightweight weir boards (refer to paragraph 3, Operational Flexibility). <br />b. The fishway exit area is large enough to accommodate an <br />8-foot-wide, 16-foot-long, 5-foot-high trap. The fish are guided into <br />the trap through a V-shaped notch in the trap structure. Fish easily <br />find their way into the trap but do not easily find their way out through <br />the notch. The trap allows for exiting or trapping of fish by means of <br />an upstream gate. The downstream end of -the notch can be closed and the <br />fish can be crowded to the water surface for observation or tagging. <br />Fish can also be removed from the ladder, while being contained in the • <br />trap, by means of a hoist, <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.