My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7316
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7316
Author
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Title
Redlands Dam Fishway Feasibility Study, Gunnison River, Colorado.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Walla Walla.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r~ <br /> <br />b. Impacts. <br />(1) Impacts Affecting RWPC. <br />(a) To attain desirable fish attraction condi- <br />tions, RWPC may be asked to slightly modify their standard operating pro- <br />cedures. During high spring flows, releases of flow through the existing <br />sluice gates should be regulated for the best fish attraction conditions. <br />Flow from the sluice gates should not create a velocity barrier at the <br />west fish entrance during the migration season. Also, as flashboards are <br />installed on the dam crest, their placement should start at the right <br />bank (looking downstream) and progress toward the left bank. This should <br />keep the attraction flow, created by spilling of water over the crest, <br />near the fish ladder. <br />(b) Bar screen may be installed across all four <br />power canal headgates. The head loss through the screens is approximately <br />0.2 foot with all gates fully open. This bar screen will not be installed <br />until it is determined that the ladder successfully passes fish into the <br />f orebay. <br />(c) The ladder structure blocks a portion of the <br />spillway that would normally pass riverflows. Therefore, sediment may <br />accumulate behind the diversion dam in the ladder area. RWPC may be <br />asked to open the sluice gates for the purpose of flushing accumulated <br />sediment from behind the dam. <br />(d) Construction of the fish ladder will only <br />have minor impacts on RWPC. The bar screen installation, if necessary, <br />would be scheduled to coincide with the dewatering of the power canal for <br />maintenance. Also, the upstream cofferdam can be constructed around the <br />ladder structure only, and not interfere with the power generation and <br />irrigation flows into the power canal. However, this alternate would <br />require two construction seasons if the full-size ladder was added. <br />(e) RWPC will be asked to continue their efforts <br />for removing trash at the dam. <br />(2) Impacts Affecting FWS. <br />(a) FWS will operate and maintain the fishway <br />facility. This alternate will require that fish be released from the <br />trap periodically (check trap every day during migration season), weir <br />boards be installed or removed, flow valves and entrance slide gates be <br />• adjusted, and debris be removed from the fish ladder trashrack. <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.