My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7316
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7316
Author
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Title
Redlands Dam Fishway Feasibility Study, Gunnison River, Colorado.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Walla Walla.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(b) Bar screen may be installed across all four <br />power canal headgates. The head loss through the screens is approximately <br />0.2 foot with all gates fully open. This bar screen will not be installed <br />until it is determined that the ladder successfully passes fish into the <br />forebay. <br />(c) The ladder structure blocks a portion of the <br />spillway that would normally pass riverflows. Therefore, sediment may <br />accumulate behind the diversion dam in the ladder and trashrack area. <br />RWPC may be asked to open the sluice gates for the purpose of flushing <br />accumulated sediment from behind the dam. <br />(d) Construction of the fish ladder will only have <br />minor impacts on RWPC. The bar screen installation, if necessary, would <br />be scheduled to coincide with the dewatering of the potiver canal for <br />maintenance. Also, the upstream cofferdam can be constructed around the <br />ladder structure only and not interfere with the power generation and <br />irrigation flows into the power canal. <br />(e) The trash shear boom will reduce the. amount <br />of trash and debris that RWPC must handle at the dam, in the power canal, <br />and at the powerhouse. However, if the bar screen is added, a greater <br />portion of the debris will be handled at the dam. Because of this <br />overall reduction of debris, RWPC will still be responsible for debris <br />removal. <br />(2) Impacts Affecting FWS. <br />(a) FWS will operate and maintain the fishraay <br />facility. This alternate will require that fish be released from the <br />trap periodically (check trap every day during migration season), weir <br />boards be installed or removed, the auxiliary flow valve and entrance <br />slide gates be adjusted, and debris be removed from the fish ladder <br />trashrack. <br />(b) Also, some maintenance of mechanical equipment <br />(valve, slide gates, fish hoist) is required intermittently to keep these <br />items in proper working order. <br />5. Estimate of Costs. <br />a. Table 3, Estimate, Alternate No. lA, presents the <br />materials and installation costs of the fish ladder, bar screen, and <br />trash shear boom. At the feasibility study level, a contingency factor <br />• of 25 percent is added to the materials and installation costs to account <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.