My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7316
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7316
Author
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Title
Redlands Dam Fishway Feasibility Study, Gunnison River, Colorado.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Walla Walla.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(3) The ladder is offset from the existing sluice • <br />gates approximately 15 feet. The west side edge of the ladder is located <br />to accommodate the upstream trashrack, auxiliary evater piping, and the <br />diffuser. Preliminary computations for Alternate No. 1 show that offset- <br />ting the ladder from the sluice gates reduces high velocities near the <br />west ladder entrance. <br />(4) The bottom of each vertical slot and orifice is <br />flush with the ladder floor, so that these "bottom swimmer" species are <br />not required to avoid obstacles. However, the circulation of flow in the <br />ladder pools may not behave as expected. The development of most vertical <br />slot ladders is based on model studies using 8-foot-wide by 10-foot-long <br />pools. So when the ladder pools are reduced to 8 feet wide by 5 feet <br />long, the flow through the slot may "short-circuit" from one slot to the <br />next downstream slot. With this flow pattern, energy may not 6e <br />dissipated in the pools and flow could become excessively turbulent. <br />If problems occur, field adjustments in the ladder should alleviate any <br />undesirable flow patterns. Field adjustments could include the use of a <br />small sill at the bottom of the slot and/or an addition of a directional <br />wing downstream of the slot. See Plate 12 for positioning of sill and/or <br />directional wing with respect to the vertical slot. Also, orifices may <br />need to be closed if satisfactory flow patterns are not attained. <br />(5) This ladder configuration has potential of forming <br />a much larger gravel bar downstream from the ladder structure than <br />Alternate No. 1. The bar would be larger because this alternate blocks a <br />longer portion of the spillway than Alternate No 1. This larger bar may <br />eventually block passage to the east fish entrance unless the area was <br />dredged periodically. <br />b. Impacts. <br />(1) Impacts Affecting RWPC. <br />(a) To attain desirable fish attraction condi- <br />tions, RWPC may be asked to slightly modify their standard operating <br />procedures. During high spring flows, releases of flow through the <br />existing sluice gates should be regulated for the best fish attraction <br />conditions. Flow from the sluice gates should not create a velocity <br />barrier at the west fish entrance during the migration season. Also, as <br />flashboards are installed on the dam crest, their placement should start <br />at the right bank (looking downstream) and progress toward the left bank. <br />This should keep the attraction flow, created by spilling of water over <br />the crest, near the fish ladder. <br />• <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.