Laserfiche WebLink
STOCKING VERSUS NATURAL RECRUITMENT IN ATLANTIC SALMON (SALMO SALAR <br />L.) AND BROWN TROUT (SALMO TRUTTA L.): THE SIGNIFICAP7CE OF REDUCED <br />STOCKING IN THE RIVER, L~ERDALSELVA, WESTERN NORWAY. S.J. Saltveit, <br />Zoological Museum, Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Laboratory, <br />University of Oslo, Sarsgt. 1, 0567. Oslo 5, Norway. <br />Since the regulation of the river Lwrdalselva, western Norway, in 1974, a <br />large number of juvenile Atlantic salmon and brown trout (sea trout) have <br />been stocked above the natural reach for anadromous fish to compensate for <br />possible loss in salmon production. In 1988 the numbers of Atlantic salmon <br />stocked were drastically reduced, while stocking of sea trout was terminated. <br />Between 1982 and 1987 the annunal mean number of Atlantic salmon yearlings <br />stocked was 545 000, while in 1988, 1989 and 1990 the mean number stocked was <br />116 000, an average reduction of about 80~. In comparison with density <br />estimated for yearlings (O+) in 1984 and 1985, the densities of O+ in_21989 <br />and 1990 were reduced by 80-90~, i.e. frog 42.7 and 33.2 fish. 100 m in <br />1984 and 1985 to 4.3 and 6.0 fish. 100 m in 1989 and 1990. A strongly <br />significant correlation (P~0.001) was found between the numbers of Atlantic <br />salmon yearlings (0+) stocked and the corresponding density of 0+ in the <br />river. The reduction in salmon density occured even though fish ladders <br />allowed natural reproduction. The lack of natural reproduction was due to <br />few salmon moving up through the fish ladders and the fact that very few of <br />these were females (20~). Only a small decline was observed in the density <br />of brown trout yearlings, and the density of older fish did not decline in <br />the same way as for older salmon. There are both anadromous and non migratory <br />brown trout, and far more sea trout of, which 70~ are females, negotiate the <br />f i ch 1 aAr7arc <br />JUVENILE COMPETITIVE BOTLENECK IN THE PRODUCTION OF <br />BROWN TROUT IN HYDROELECTRIC RESERVOIRS DUE TO <br />INTRASPESIFIC HABITAT SEGREGATION. Ola Hegge, Trygve <br />Hesthagen & Jostein Skurdal. Oppland County Environmental <br />Administration, Statsetatenes hus, N-2600 Lillehammer, Norway <br />We studied resource utilization and growth of brown trout in 7 norwegian hydroelectric <br />reservoirs with supplementary stockings, by benthic and pelagic gillnett sampling. In lazge, <br />deep (>_ 35 m) reservoirs, without planktivore competitors, brown trout segregated <br />according to size, as small individuals (< 200 -250 mm) mainly occurred in benthic <br />habitats while larger individuals utilized upper strata of pelagic waters. The habitat use of <br />brown trout was mainly benthic in shallow reservoirs with higher benthic food production <br />and in reservoirs with plankton feeding whitefish. In large, deep reservoirs, the shift from <br />benthic to pelagic habitat was accompanied by an increase in growth. This indicates that the <br />conditions for young age classes may be a bottleneck in the capacity to produce brown <br />trout in hydroelectric reservoirs with limited benthic feeding conditions, despite an ample <br />access to food in pelagic habitats. Thus, when evaluating the possibility of increasing <br />brown trout production by supplementary stockings, it is necessazy to consider food and <br />growth conditions for all age/size groups of brown trout. <br />10 <br />