Laserfiche WebLink
RESPONSE OF NATIVE FISH HABITAT TO HYDRODAM PEAKING POWER RELEASES <br />IN THE COLORADO RIVER. Richard A Valdez, Senior Aquatic Ecologist, BIO/WEST, Inc., <br />Logan, Utah. <br />The construction of 13 major dams on the Colorado River of the southwestern United States has <br />segmented native fish habitat contributing to the extirpation and endangerment of some species. Of 13 <br />fish species native to the mainstem Colorado River, four are federally endangered - Colorado squawfish, <br />humpback chub, bonytail chub, and razorback sucker. Each has speck habitat requirements and I'rfe <br />history aspects that evolved over 5 million years and have been disrupted by habitat fragmentation and <br />altered natural flow regimes. Proper water-release management of these dams, particularly the <br />hydropower units, is vftal to preserving remaining habitats and populations. Properly-timed flow releases, <br />durations, ramping rates, and flow magnitudes can minimize detrimental impacts, enhance existing <br />habitats, and aid species recovery. Obtaining sound biological information to describe these needs <br />requires innovative methods and techniques necessary to cope with the remote whitewater nature of the <br />turbid Colorado River. The ecological requirements of the humpback chub are currently under <br />investigation in the Grand Canyon as part of Bureau of Reclamation's Glen Canyon Environmental <br />Studies. Radiotelemetry is the primary tool for gathering movement and behavioral data relative to <br />various flow conditions, and habitat is described with the aid of aerial photography, mapping, sonar, and <br />staff gages. The sedentary nature of this species and the need for the Grand Canyon population to <br />access spawning tributaries dictates specific flow requirements. This paper describes the principles of <br />data collection for the four endangered species and contrasts their I'rfe history requirements as affected <br />by the major hydropower dams of the Colorado River, with the focus on the humpback chub of the <br />Grand Canyon. <br />FISHBIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF A DANUBE IMPOUNDMENT (ALTENWORTH, AUSTRIA). <br />Herwig G. Waidbacher, Dep. of Hydrobiology, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Univ. <br />of Agriculture, Feistmantelstr. 4, A-1180 Vienna, Austria. <br />From 1985 to 198'] fishbiological investigations have been performed in impounded and <br />free-flowing areas of the Danube. Seventy percent of the Austrian Danube section is <br />already impounded for hydropower generation. <br />The impoundment of "Altenworth" is located about 50 km west of Vienna, its length is <br />approximately 30 km, the theoretical water exchange 10 to 15 hours. Stream flow is <br />reduced from 1.5 m/s to 0.4 m/s. Seventy-five percent of the impoundment is lined by <br />earth dams, the shoreline is secured with a monotonous riprap. Due to reduced current <br />speed, increased depth, silty to muddy sediments and high benthic biomass, the <br />impoundment conforms more to a habitat for limnophilic fish species. However, the <br />relatively low average annual temperature of the Danube, the lack of shoreline structure <br />and the low plankton density inhibit better development of lacustrine fish associations. <br />Distinct riparian macrophyte groups which serve as spawning ground, nursery and feeding <br />place for juvenile fish, are seriously affected by flood events or even constant high <br />average discharges and in such a case lose their protective functions. <br />Mainly two fishing methods were used. In the shore area, samples were taken with an <br />electrofishing boat (Coffelt system, 10 anodes in front of the boat). Longlines (50 - <br />300 m) were used to sample fish from the river bottom. <br />The original dominant rheophilic fish fauna was represented in the impoundment by adult <br />individuals only, which obviously use the rich food resources. Corresponding juvenile <br />fish could only be detected in the free-flowing section except a few individuals in the <br />uppermost part of the impoundment. For typical rheophilic fish species there are no <br />spawning grounds in the impoundment. <br />The remaining free-flowing section upstream significantly influences the species <br />composition of the impoundment as indicated by the unexpectedly high number of species <br />recorded (38). <br />