Laserfiche WebLink
from those shown in the preferred alternative of the EIS. They were 11) increasing <br />the normal maximum flow from 20,000 cfs to 25,000 cfs and 12- increasing the <br />upramp rate from 2,500 cfs/hour to 4,000 cfs/hour. The ROD also changed the <br />triggering mechanisms for conducting beach/habitat-building flows. Instead of <br />conducting them in years when Lake Powell storage is low on January 1, they will <br />be conducted in years when Lake Powell storage is high and requires reservoir <br />releases in excess of powerplant capacity for dam safety purposes. Following the <br />signing of the ROD, the Secretary adopted a set of operating criteria and a 1997 <br />plan of operation. This terminated the 1991 interim flow criteria. <br />The signing of the ROD began a new chapter in the history of Glen Canyon <br />Dam. In addition to meeting traditional water and power needs, the dam is now <br />being operated in a more environmentally sensitive manner. The EIS process <br />demonstrated the value of a cooperative, integrative approach to dealing with <br />complex environmental issues. The inclusion of all stakeholders resulted in a <br />process that will serve to guide future operations of Glen Canyon Dam, and become <br />a template for other river systems. <br />a. Adaptive Management <br />Section 1805 of the GCPA directs the Secretary to establish and implement <br />long-term monitoring programs on the natural, recreational, and cultural resources <br />of Grand Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. The <br />"Adaptive Management Program" (AMP) is a key element of the preferred <br />alternative outlined in the final EIS and implemented by the ROD. The program <br />provides for operation of Glen Canyon Dam for environmental purposes in Glen and <br />Grand Canyons in addition to traditional water and power generation. <br />The AMP provides a process for incorporating science and <br />recommendations from a diverse group of stakeholders in the evaluation and <br />management of future dam operations. The AMP calls for continued interaction of <br />managers and scientists to both monitor the effects of current dam operations on <br />the Colorado River ecosystem, and to conduct research on alternative dam operating <br />criteria that may be necessary to ensure protection of resources and improve natural <br />processes. The AMP identifies the following entities that contribute to the adaptive <br />management process: (1) Adaptive Management Work Group (AMWG), (2) <br />Technical Work Group (TWG-, (3) Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center <br />(GCMRCI, and (4) Science Advisory Board. <br />The AMWG is a Federal Advisory Committee chartered by the Secretary <br />consisting of a group of stakeholders-that are federal and state resource managers, <br />Native American tribes, power marketers, environmental groups, recreationists and <br />other interest groups. The AMWG was established to develop, evaluate, and <br />recommend alternative operations strategies for Glen Canyon Dam and make <br />recommendations to the Secretary. The AMWG does not displace federal agency <br />legal authority and responsibility to manage resources in the best interests of both <br />the environment and society. <br />In addition to creation of the AMWG, the TWG and GCMRC were created <br />to play vital roles as part of the adaptive management process. The TWG is <br />composed of technical representatives appointed by the AMWG. The TWG provides <br />the AMWG detailed guidance on issues and objectives, develops criteria and <br />standards for research and monitoring programs, provides information for annual <br />33 <br />