Laserfiche WebLink
ranged between 1 ,000 cfs and 25,000 cfs, with flows averaging between 5,000 <br />cfs and 20,000 cfs. <br />As a result of construction of Glen Canyon Dam, the Colorado River <br />ecosystem below the dam has changed significantly from its pre-dam natural <br />character. In addition, the dam's highly variable flow releases from 1964 to 1991 <br />caused additional concern over resource degradation resulting from dam operations. <br />The Secretary of the Interior adopted interim operations criteria in October 1991 <br />which narrowed the range of daily powerpiant fluctuations. Since the signing of the <br />operating criteria in February 1997, these releases do not now exceed 25,000 cfs, <br />and most often average between 10,000 cfs and 20,000 cfs. <br />Responding to concerns that changes to the Colorado River ecosystem <br />were resulting from dam operations, Reclamation launched the Glen Canyon <br />Environmental Studies program in 1982. The research program's first phase (1982- <br />1988) focused on developing baseline resource assessments of physical and biotic <br />resources. The second program phase (1989-1996) expanded research programs <br />in native and non-native fishes, hydrology and aquatic habitats, terrestrial flora and <br />fauna, cultural and ethnic resources, and social and economic impacts. <br />By the late 1980s, sufficient knowledge had been developed to raise <br />concerns that downstream impacts were occurring and that additional information <br />needed to be developed to quantify the effects and to develop management actions <br />that could avoid and/or mitigate the impacts. This collective information, and other <br />factors, led to a July 1989 decision by the Secretary to direct Reclamation to <br />prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) on the operation of Glen Canyon <br />Dam. The intent was to evaluate alternative operation strategies to lessen the <br />impacts of operations on downstream resources. <br />In October 1992, the President signed into law the Reclamation Projects <br />Authorization and Adjustments Act., Public Law (P.L.) 102-575. Responding to <br />continued concerns over potential impacts of Glen Canyon Dam operations on <br />downstream resources, Congress included the Grand Canyon Protection Act (GCPA) <br />as Title 18 of the Reclamation Projects Act. Section 1802(a) of the GCPA requires <br />the Secretary to operate Glen Canyon Dam: <br />... in accordance with the additional criteria and operating plans <br />specified in Section 1804 and exercise other authorities under <br />existing law in such a manner as to protect, mitigate adverse <br />impacts to, and improve the values for which Grand Canyon <br />National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area were <br />established, including, but not limited to natural and cultural <br />resources and visitor use. <br />The GCPA directs the Secretary to implement this section in a manner fully <br />consistent with all existing laws that govern allocation, appropriation, development, <br />and exportation of the waters of the Colorado River Basin. <br />Section 1804 of the GCPA required preparation of an EIS, adoption of <br />operating criteria and plans, reports to Congress, and allocation of costs. The <br />Operation of Glen Canyon Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with <br />the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in March 1995 and a Record of Decision <br />(ROD) was signed in October 1996. The ROD changed only two flow parameters <br />32 <br />