My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7119 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7119 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:45:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7119
Author
Emery, L.
Title
Physiological effects of electrofishing.
USFW Year
1984.
USFW - Doc Type
February 3-4, 1984.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
crevices when shocked, making them hard to see and difficult to collect. Other species that <br />are pelagic are not easily captured by electrofishing because-they stay in waters that are <br />too deep to be electrofished. Species that exhibit territorial behavior are easily captured <br />because .they are not normally frightened by an approaching electrofishing operation. By <br />targeting a species, the collector can do things to improve the chances of collecting them <br />by electrofishing. For example, by increasing the pulses per second on a backpack shocker, <br />one can collect smaller fish that would normally not 6e collected. <br />loo <br />90 <br />~ 70 <br />~ 60 <br />4 <br />0 <br />i <br />` 50 <br />c <br />" 40 <br />n <br />70 <br />20 <br />10 <br />s a 4 s e 7 <br />Teal lenafh In Inches <br />lso <br />110 <br />100 <br />90 <br />>f 0 <br />70 <br />0 <br />60 <br />E SO <br />~` 40 <br />i <br />.. s0 <br />ZO <br />10 <br />fe/e1 length (~willimeter,) <br />Figure 2. Percentage of marked trout of Figure 3. Relation between recovery time <br />various lengths recaptured with <br />230-volt, 2500-watt, direct- measured in seconds, and total <br />current electrofishin length of common shiners (Adams <br />g gear et al. 1972). <br />(McFadden 1961). <br />Resistance, or the ability of individual fish to conduct-electricity, varies greatly among <br />species. The res istance of a fish. acts to reduce the voltage gradient that it encounters <br />from head-to-tail, and it is that change in gradient that is needed to make electrofishing <br />possible. Normally a head-to-tail gradient of from 0.1 to 1 V/cm of fish is required to <br />collect fish with an electrical current. The resistance of various species affects their <br />ability to 6e collected with electrofishing gear. The four species listed in Table 1 show <br />a range of res stivity (Halsband 1967). <br />Table 1. Calculated resistances for various types of fish (adapted from <br />Halsband 1967). <br /> <br />Species <br /> Resistance (ohm/cm) <br />Trout <br />Perch 818 <br />Carp 981 <br />Gudgeon 1,149 <br /> 1,228 <br />The trout has less resistance than the carp and is thus more susceptible to electric cur- <br />rent. The higher the resistivity of a fish, the more current it can absorb without effect. <br />Resistance can also change with temperature. Table 2 shows how the resistivity of carp <br />CAL-NEVA WILDLIFE TRANSACTIONS 1984 <br />61 <br />sa 60 70 BO 90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.