Laserfiche WebLink
stimuli of low intensity and short duration can cause impulses to be transmitted. In these <br />instances, there is a cumulative effect (summation) and the impulse is transmitted by the <br />"all or none" phenomena. In general, it's the fish's attraction to the positive electrode, <br />the anode, that makes electrofishing possible. This is caused by a brain reflex in the fish <br />that causes a forced swimming toward the anode (Yibert 1963). <br />External Factors Affectin Electrofishin Success <br />It is well known that electrofishing techniques are selective to larger fish. A bigger fish <br />has more total surface area than a smaller fish, thus receives or is exposed to more current <br />or total energy, and is, therefore, easier to collect. Larger fish usually receive a <br />greater shock because total body voltage increases with length. I've broken the external <br />factors that affect electrofishing into four main groups: size, species, physiological <br />condition, and environmental conditions. <br />Size. The total surface area of a fish can influence the success of capturing it with <br />electric current. Sometimes this principle may be a little deceiving because we tend to <br />think of big fish more in terms of length and weight rather than total surface area. For <br />example, it would appear to be easier to collect a 6-inch northern pike (Esox Zucius) than <br />it would be to collect a 6-inch bluegill (Lepomis macrochimcs) However, the total surface <br />area of the bluegill is greater than the fusiform shaped pike (Figure 1). <br />`. <br />TROUT <br />SUCKER 0 <br />PIKE 0 <br />SUNFISH <br />SCULPIN O <br />Figure 1. Morphology and cross section of various fish species. <br />(Not drawn to scale.) --- <br />Two examples that demonstrate size selectivity of electrofishing gear are: 1) electro- <br />fishing gear was about 25~ effective in collecting 2 1/2 inch long brook trout (SaZveZinus <br />fontinaZis) and about 70~ effective in collecting 8 1/2 inch long brook trout (Figure 2) <br />(McFadden 1961); and 2) small fish have less total surface area, therefore, the fish ab- <br />sorbs less energy and recovers quicker. Common shiners (Notropis cornutus) ranging from <br />85-95 mm long, took about two minutes to fully recover after receiving a do current, while <br />smaller fish, 65-70 mm long, took about 45 seconds to recover (Figure 3) (Adams et al. <br />1972). <br />S ecies. Each species is unique and reacts differently to an electrical current. Vulner- <br />a i qty to electrofishing varies among species because of differences in anatomy and be- <br />havior (Reynolds 1983). Some species have large thick scales to rotect them from the <br />penetrating electrical energy (e.g., common carp, G'yprinus carpio~. Others, like the cat- <br />fish. (Ictaluridae), have no scales for protection. Some small-scaled species, like trout <br />(Salmonidae) and eels (Anguil1idae), are easier to collect--than thick-scaled species. There <br />are also species that are adapted to staying on the bottom. These species have hi h speci- <br />fic-gravity, may lack a swim bladder, or have a rudimentary ,one like some darters ~Percidae) <br />and sculpins (Cottidae), have fewer scales,and tend to roll over and become lodged in rock <br />CAL-NEVA WILDLIFE TRANSACTIONS 1984 <br />60 <br />