Laserfiche WebLink
SPAWNING CUES FOR COLORADO SQUAWFTSH <br />73 <br />TABLE 2.-Magnitude and relative frequency of baseline flow spikes in the Yampa River (Maybell gage) during <br />June 16-August 15, 1934-1986. <br />Cumulative <br />Flow Number of frequency <br />(m'!s) occasions (%) <br />Frequency <br />(number/53 yeazs) <br />Mean <br />interval <br />(Years) <br />Maxi- <br />mum <br />interval <br />(years) <br />28.3+ 18 26 <br />25.5+ 23 34 <br />22.7+ 25 37 <br />19.8+ 30 44 <br />17.0+ 36 53 <br />14.2+ 41 60 <br />11.3+ 50 74 <br />8.5+ 59 87 <br />5.7+ 67 99 <br />2.8+ 68 100 <br />17 <br />19 <br />19 <br />23 <br />28 <br />32 <br />2.1 <br />1.7 <br />1.7 <br />1.2 <br />0.8 <br />0.6 <br />by July 28 when flow decreased to 79.6 m3/s. In <br />1983, major spawning activity ceased by August 1 <br />when river flow dropped below 62.9 m3/s. <br />Discussion <br />Our hypothesis formed from these comparisons <br />of flow spikes and spawning periods is that a flow <br />spike near baseline in the Yampa River acts as a <br />recurring environmental cue to adult Colorado <br />squawfish to initiate the spawning process of egg <br />deposition and fertilization. The flow spike repre- <br />sents the observable physical event we have as- <br />sociated with Colorado squawfish spawning, but <br />we do not exclude the possibility that, in reality, <br />one or more environmental variables coincidental <br />to the flow spike may be serving as the actual cue <br />perceived by the adult fish. Prior to a discussion <br />of the role the flow spike cue might play in the <br />reproductive ecology of this species, an evalua- <br />tion of the approach used to establish the above <br />hypothesis is necessary. The limited population <br />size associated with an endangered species, the <br />difficulties of representative sampling in the <br />aquatic environment, and the indirect methods <br />used complicate interpretations of the biological <br />significance of Yampa River flow spikes in the <br />spawning ecology of the Colorado squawfish. <br />Although the cumulative affect of these sources of <br />variation upon the alignment of the flow spike <br />with peak spawning by Colorado squawfish is <br />unpredictable, these uncertainties are considered <br />to be responsible for the noise evident in the <br />alignments and do not detract from an otherwise <br />remarkably consistent relationship. The strength <br />of the flow-cue hypothesis is based on the close <br />association noted between flow spikes and peak <br />spawning activity in 4 consecutive years. <br />Potential Sources of Error <br />Use of different sampling gear may be respon- <br />sible for differences in the total catch of larvae <br />between 1983-1986 and 1980-1982. The inclusion <br />of drift-net sampling in 1983-1986 and the poten- <br />tial inadequacy of seine sampling for representa- <br />tively sampling drifting Colorado squawfish larvae <br />may account for the observed differences rather <br />than a biological change signifying increased <br />spawning success. Drift-net data from Haynes et <br />al. (1985) and Nesler (1986) demonstrated that <br />larval Colorado squawfish were transported <br />downstream and out of the Yampa River within 3- <br />15 dafter hatching. The majority of Colorado <br />squawfish larvae produced in the Yampa River in <br />a given year may be transported downriver as a <br />discrete group that is present in any 6-km segment <br />of the river for only 1-2 d (Nesler 1986). Drift-net <br />sampling over time at a permanent station would <br />ultimately pickup this concentration of larvae and <br />TABLE 3.-Frequency distribution of flow spikes according to duration in number of days to peak. <br /> Number of spikes of duration <br />Flow (m3/s) l d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 d 6 d 7 d <br />25.5+ 2 5 5 5 1 3 2 <br />14.2-22.7+ 4 6 5 1 1 0 1 <br />Total 6 11 10 6 2 3 3 <br />All flows 8 21 16 11 4 5 3 <br />