My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7195
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7195
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:42:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7195
Author
Nesler, T. P., R. T. Muth and A. F. Wasowicz
Title
Evidence for Baseline Flow Spikes as Spawning Cues for Colorado Squawfish in the Yampa River, Colorado
USFW Year
1988
USFW - Doc Type
American Fisheries Society Symposium
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
72 <br />m <br />E <br />0 <br />LL <br />E <br />0 <br />LL <br />1982 <br />z <br />c <br />m <br />m <br />0 <br />x <br />z <br />c <br />3 <br />m <br />0 <br />T <br />cvv Z <br />m 220 _ 30 ~ <br />$ 180 /Maybell ` a <br />140 20 ~ <br />100 ~' <br />so 10 = <br />TTT~"-~-T Il-T n~ II ~~ p ~n '-_-_ <br />20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 <br />JUN JUL AUG <br />FtcutsF, 4.-Relationships of estimated Colorado <br />squawfish spawning dates (vertical bars) to Yampa River <br />flow regimes (curves) at the U.S. Geological Survey's <br />Maybell and Deerlodge gages for 1980-1982. Number of <br />fish represents number sampled and distributed accord- <br />ing to estimated spawning date. <br />spike events, whereas in 1982, the flow spike <br />occurred in the middle of the spawning period. <br />Comparison of the Deerlodge and Maybell hy- <br />drographs for the Yampa River each year from <br />1982 through 1986 (Figures 3 and 4) indicated that <br />flow fluctuations were regional in their occur- <br />rence. The two USGS gages are 65 km apart, and <br />it is presumed from this that similar flow fluctua- <br />tions would also be evident at the Colorado <br />squawfish spawning area 47 km downstream from <br />Deerlodge. During 1982-1986, the flow spikes of <br />interest began simultaneously at both sites but <br />NESLER ET AL. <br />their peaks were simultaneous at both sites only in <br />1984. In 1983, 1985, and 1986, the flow spike peak <br />occurred at the Deerlodge site 1 d later than at the <br />Maybell site. Therefore, date of occurrence of a <br />flow spike at the primary Colorado squawfish <br />spawning area at km 24-30 was considered tem- <br />porally proximal to its occurrence at the upstream <br />gage stations. Flow spikes were associated with <br />major rainstorms in the area of Dinosaur National <br />Monument. In each yeaz from 1980 to 1986, rain- <br />storms representing 17-89% of the month's precip- <br />itation occurred immediately preceding the flow <br />spikes related to Colorado squawfish spawning. <br />Examination of daily flow hydrographs for the <br />Yampa River during the June 16-August 15 period <br />from 1934 through 1986 suggested that baseline flow <br />spikes might qualify as a recurring environmental <br />variable for along-lived, riverine fish species such <br />as Colorado squawfish. Sixty-eight flow spikes were <br />recorded during this season over the 53-yeaz period <br />(Table 2). Flow spikes similar to those observed for <br />1983-1986 (25.5 mils or greater) represented 34% of <br />the number documented and occurred in 19 of 53 <br />yeazs. The mean interval between these flow spikes <br />was 1.7 years. The maximum interval was 8 years. <br />The minimum magnitude of a flow spike needed to <br />act as a spawning cue is unknown, so smaller flow <br />spikes than those observed in 1983-1986 may be <br />sufficient. Flow spikes of 14.2 m'/s or greater rep- <br />resented 60% of the total number, and occurred in <br />32 of 53 years. The mean interval between occur- <br />renceswas 0.6 years and the maximum interval was <br />5 years. The duration of these baseline flow spikes <br />from beginning to peak was predominately 4 d or <br />less (Table 3). Eighty-two percent of the 68 spikes <br />peaked within this time frame. For flow spikes 25.5 <br />m3/s or greater, 74% peaked in 4 d or less. For flow <br />spikes ranging from 14.2 to 22.7 m3/s, 89% peaked in <br />4 d or less. <br />A relationship was also noted between flow <br />level and cessation of notable spawning activity <br />(Figure 3). Spawning activity in 1986 dropped <br />markedly on July 14 when flow decreased to 66.3 <br />m'/s, and ceased when flow reached 58.4 m'/s. <br />Spawning activity during the first peak in 1985 <br />appeared to drop to a negligible level by July 5, <br />when river flow decreased to 57 m3/s. During the <br />second spawning peak in 1985, substantial spawn- <br />ing started on July 23, when flow reached 62.6 m3/ <br />s after increasing from a low of 27.7 m3/s. Spawn- <br />ing activity dropped off again after July 26 as flow <br />decreased to 57.5 m3/s. In 1984, peak spawning <br />activity dropped off by July 19 when flow was at <br />95.8 m3/s and spawning activity became negligible <br />JUN JUL AUG <br />JUN JUL AUG <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.