My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9530
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9530
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:42:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9530
Author
Nelson, S. M. and D. C. Andersen
Title
Butterfly (Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea) Assemblages Associated with Natural, Exotic, and Restored Riarian Habitats along the Lower Colorado River, USA
USFW Year
1999
USFW - Doc Type
Regulated Rivers
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
486 <br />S.M. NELSON AND D.C. ANDERSEN <br />described by early investigators as `jungle' (Grinnell, 1914; Brown, 1923). In areas of near-surface ground <br />water, salt grass (Distichlis spicata) was common (Brown, 1923). Lagoons and marshes, formed from <br />abandoned. stream channels, were often present at some distance from the river and usually replenished <br />with flood waters every year (Brown, 1923). The rarely flooded Second Bottom was characterized by <br />mesquite (Prosopis spp.), saltbush (Atriplex spp.); and creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) (Grinnell, 1914). <br />River regulation and trans-basin diversion has promoted both invasion of exotic plants and conversion <br />of floodplain landscapes to irrigated agriculture. Exotic tamarisk (Tamarix ramosissima) now often <br />dominates non-agricultural riparian areas along the lower Colorado River, and areas of original <br />vegetation types, especially those associated with the First Bottom, are very rare (Ohmart et al., 1988). <br />The prediction by Sykes (1937) that river regulation and agriculture would cause the `luxuriant vegetation' <br />along the river to become desert-like has in large part come true. In response to these changes, attempts <br />are being made to restore some tamarisk-dominated sites to a condition more like that of the historic <br />riparian ecosystem. <br />Assessment of the environmental quality of revegetated areas relative to that of the historic riparian <br />ecosystem is difficult, in part because baseline data on the structure and dynamics of desert riparian <br />assemblages maintained by a highly irregular flow regime are either limited or lacking. Despite these <br />limitations,. butterfly assemblages may be useful for. investigating these riparian ecosystems., Collection. is <br />practical, natural histories-are relatively well-known, and taxa richness is. high in most areas. Sensitivity <br />of butterfly species to environmental. perturbations varies from sensitive to resilient; with various species <br />sensitive'td vegetation changes, fragmentation of habitat; and pesticides: Although direct measurement" of <br />vegetation"'can provide insight into the effects of altered flows, vegetation °may be slow to respond fo <br />environmental change. For example, cottonwood and willow may persist for many .years in a " non- <br />functioning ecosystem: Because of their rapid response to environmental perturbation, butterfly assem- <br />blages," particularly in this situation, can. serve to integrate riparian vegetation, fragmentation, and <br />ecological processes and provide a responsive measure of biodiversity (i.e., .composition,. structure, and <br />function). - <br />b ~:jt`~ c~ 1 ..t <br />The purpose. of this study was to determine whether the structure of the butterfly assemblage associated <br />with revegei'ated sites tends towad-that'assbciated~wlth "natural'riparianxlaridsca`pes as plantings~mature <br />:,; _ <br />- ~ 3,000 <br />T <br />_ `y 2,50C <br />io <br />m <br />2,000 <br />a <br />U <br />m <br />t 1,500 <br />w <br />T <br />0 1,000 <br />m <br />s 500 <br />m <br />m <br />a 0 <br />Jsn JQn 2~°` Q~° ~s~ Jce ~~~ Jy~ ,00~ ~0~ ~0~ ,00~ <br />Aso 0~~ ~ P ~ ~ ~A OF o~0 mF OF <br />Q Q' ~OQ~ O ~p`~ Op,~+ <br />Month <br />Figure 1. Comparison of non-regulated (1904-1935, n = 32) and regulated (1936-1964, n = 29) flows in the Colorado River at <br />Yuma, Arizona. Values shown are averages of mean daily discharge by month. Vertical bars around averages enclose the middle half <br />of the data (25th to 75th quartiles). Data from US Geological Survey 1954, 1964 and 1970 <br />Copyright ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Regut. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. 15: 485-504 (1999) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.