~,
<br />9'~~0 del sore ~ ~nd~~o~~
<br />REGULATED RIVERS: RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT
<br />Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. 15: 485-504 (1999)
<br />BUTTERFLY (PAPILIONOIDEA AND HESPERIOIDEA) ASSEMBLAGES
<br />ASSOCIATED WITH NATURAL, EROTIC, AND RESTORED
<br />RIPARIAN HABITATS ALONG THE LOWER COLORADO RIVER, USA
<br />S.M. NELSONa•* AND D.C. ANDERSENb '
<br />a US Department of the /nterior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA
<br />b US Geological Survey, Midcontinent Ecological Science Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA
<br />ABSTRACT
<br />Butterfly assemblages were used to compare revegetated and natural riparian areas along the lower Colorado River.
<br />Species richness and correspondence analyses of assemblages showed 'that revegetated sites had fewer biological
<br />elements than more natural sites along the Bill Williams River. Data suggest that revegetated sites do not provide
<br />resources needed by some members of the butterfly assemblage, especially those species historically associated with
<br />the cottonwood/willow ecosystem. Revegetated sites generally lacked nectar resources, larval host plants, and closed
<br />canopies. The riparian system along the regulated river segment that contains these small revegetated sites also
<br />appears to have diminished habitat heterogeneity and uncoupled riparian corridors.
<br />Revegetated sites were static environments without the successional stages caused by flooding disturbance found in
<br />more natural systems. We hypothesize that revegetation coupled with a more natural hydrology is important for
<br />restoration of butterfly assemblages along the lower Colorado River. Copyright ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
<br />xsv woR~s: butterflies; cottonwood; larval host; nectar source; restoration; revegetation; river regulation
<br />INTRODUCTION
<br />River regulation and.. development of water resources have had .deleterious effects on the riparian
<br />vegetation of the Colorado and other highly-managed rivers in the western US. Before construction of
<br />regulatory and diversion dams, the Colorado showed great irregularity in flow (Figure 1). Near its mouth,
<br />at Yuma, Arizona, discharge ranged from 0.5 m3/s to 7079 m3/s during the period 1904-1935 (US
<br />Geological Survey, 1954). This variation was probably similar at upriver sites above the confluence of
<br />tributaries such as the Gila and Bill Williams Rivers, which were also subject to large variation in peak
<br />discharges. For example, the 3-km wide by 10-km long Chemehuevis Valley that now contains Lake
<br />Havasu, the reservoir created by Parker Dam, was `all subject to overflow during normal high water'
<br />(Colorado River Commission of the State of California, 1931: 263, referencing Senate Document 142:
<br />51-52). In the larger Parker Valley, immediately downstream, `the river is said to overflow the lower
<br />bottom lands with a flood exceeding 40000 cfs [ ~ 1130 m3/s]' (Colorado River Commission of the State
<br />of California, 1931: 265). Similarly, the 19-km long Palo Verde Valley `is little but above the bed of the
<br />stream, and the entire area is subject to overflow during normal high water' (Colorado River Commission
<br />of the State of California, 1931: 267). River management since the mid-1930s has resulted in a flat
<br />hydrograph and decreased river discharge (Figure 1).
<br />Historically, riparian areas along the lower Colorado River formed on two terrace-like landforms: a
<br />First Bottom that flooded annually or nearly so, and a higher Second Bottom that flooded less frequently
<br />(Grinnell, 1914). The First Bottom was marked by tall willows (Salix gooddingii) and Fremont
<br />cottonwoods (Populus fremonti) in largely continuous bands that, although typically -100-200 m in width,
<br />could be up to 11 km wide in valley areas (Grinnell, 1914). The dense foliage of these riparian areas was
<br />' Correspondence to: Bureau of Reclamation, D-8220, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, CO, 80225-5007, USA.
<br />CCC 0886-9375/99/060485-20$17.50 Received 3 March 1998
<br />Copyright ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Revised 25 September 1998
<br />Accepted 3 December 1998
<br />~'S3o
<br />
|