My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8009
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:38:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8009
Author
Natural Resources Law Center.
Title
Restoring the Waters.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Boulder, CO.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
By their nature, <br />instream benefits may <br />be slow to develop and <br />hard to measure. <br />some federal agencies and other environ- <br />mental groups trying to acquire water for <br />instream flows. Sometimes it is difficult to <br />arrive at a price that properly aligns the <br />value to the seller or lessor and the value <br />to the Trust. In the Buck Hollow lease <br />transaction (see Oregon Water Trust), it <br />was relatively easy for the rancher to value <br />his water right. He used the water on a <br />particular pasture to irrigate hay to feed <br />his cattle. He knew the pasture normally <br />produced 68 tons of hay and, at the going <br />rate, that amounted to $6,600 worth of <br />hay. That became his asking price. It was <br />more difficult for the Trust to be sure that <br />it was going to achieve $6,600 worth of <br />fisheries benefit in one season of leaving <br />the water in the creek. By nature, instream <br />benefits may be slow to develop and hard <br />to measure. To some extent, then, the <br />Trust is operating on faith that over time <br />its investments will pay off. <br />Boulder Creek: When a water right is <br />donated, the donor may have to justify the <br />cost of the instream flow right to its <br />constituents. In the City of Boulder's <br />transaction, the city estimates the value of <br />the transferred rights at $12 million, <br />calculated as the yield of the water right <br />times the tap fee for that amount of water. <br />In addition, the water right donation costs <br />the city about $150 per acre foot per year <br />in additional operation and maintenance <br />(O&M) costs since the city treats poorer <br />18 <br />quality water from other sources to replace <br />the water left in Boulder Creek. This extra <br />O&M cost adds from $87,500 to <br />$265,000 per year to the cost of Boulder <br />water, depending on how much water must <br />be left in the creek to meet the minimum <br />flow requirements. <br />The entire value of instream flow water <br />may not, however, be lost to a city. Boulder <br />Creek's instream flow right is dedicated <br />only to a point east of the city where the <br />sewage treatment plant discharges. Beyond <br />this point, there is no scarcity of stream <br />flow, and the water left in the stream that <br />formerly was consumptively used is <br />considered "new" to the stream at this <br />point. Boulder retains ownership of this <br />water downstream of the treatment plant <br />and can, therefore, lease, store or exchange <br />it out at other locations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.