Laserfiche WebLink
OVERVIEW <br />TABLE 1.5 Physical Limitations on <br />Fisheries of Perennial Streams <br /> Miles Percents <br />Siltation 265,000 39.8 <br />Bank erosion 152,000 22.8 <br />Channel modifications 143,500 21.5 <br />Migratory blockages 39,700 6.0 <br />Bank encroachment 9,000 1.4 <br />NOTE: Streams surveyed in 1982. <br />sPercent of the 666,000 miles surveyed <br />SouxcE: Judy et al., 1984. <br />29 <br />Little change seemed to occur over the intervening 5-year period (Table <br />1.6). Regardless of when the survey was conducted, only 5 or 6 percent <br />of the miles surveyed supported high-quality sport fisheries or exotic <br />species. Minimal or lower-quality species of fish were found in more <br />than one-third of the streams. Approximately three-quarters of the streams <br />would support only slow-quality sport fishery. <br />TABLE 1.6 Level of Aquatic Sport Species Supported by Fisheries of <br />Perennial Streams Surveyed in 1977 and 1982 <br /> <br />Class <br />Level <br />Supporteds 1977 <br />Miles <br />Percent 1982 <br />Miles <br />Percent <br />0 No species 29,000 4 29,000 4 <br />1 Nonsport species 48,000 7 49,000 7 <br />2 Minimal sport species 170,000 26 166,000 25 <br />3 Low sport species 224,000 34 228,000 34 <br />4 Moderate sport species 155,000 23 156,000 23 <br />5 High sport and special <br /> species 38,000 6 35,000 5 <br />Surveyed 666,000 100 666,000 100 <br />NOTE: Streams surveyed in 1982. <br />sThe fish are classed according to nongame (e.g., carp), game (e.g., bass), and spe- <br />cial species (e.g., cutthroat trout). The descriptors of abundance (minimal, low, mod- <br />erate, and high) were subjectively determined, the assessment being made by person- <br />nel of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and state fish management agencies. <br />SOURCE: Judy et al., 1984. <br />