My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5001
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
5001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:34:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
5001
Author
Nicola, S. J.
Title
Fisheries Problems Associated With the Development of the Lower Colorado River.
USFW Year
1981.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />-12- <br />• <br />the government agency given responsibility by Congress to develop the <br />river, the Bureau of Reclamation, has been dredging and channelizing <br />various sections of the river since 1949. <br />As the flooding and drainage problems have been brought under control, <br />the Bureau has extended its dredging and channelization activities for <br />the purpose of making more water available for agricultural, domestic, <br />and industrial consumption. The growth of population and agriculture in <br />the American Southwest, stimulated by the availability of water and power <br />provided by the Bureau's dams, has exceeded the supply of water that was <br />believed needed at the time the projects were authorized by Congress. <br />Dredging and channelization have probably caused greater changes in river <br />hydrodynamics and morphology than have. the dams. Silt that is dredged <br />from the channel is deposited along the shoreline and in backwater marshes, <br />lagoons, and lakes (Figure 3); unstable banks are lined with rocks;. and <br />fn areas where the river is judged to be "too wide", current deflectors or <br />"training" structures are constructed in the river to direct the flow <br />toward the center of the channel. The Bureau may or may not fill the <br />area behind the current deflectors with dirt and gravel, but if they do <br />not, silt eventually accumulates behind them anyway; cattails (Typha sp.) <br />and other vegetation encroaches; and, in the absence of flooding, the area <br />eventually forms a stable shoreline "naturally". <br />Another measure employed by the Bureau to obtain more water for agricultural <br />and domestic use is removal. of riparian vegetation. Introduced salt cedar <br />(Tcancrrix spp.) transpire large quantities of water daily. As the cost <br />of controlling these species have climbed, the Bureau is now attempting <br />to reestablish cottonwoods (Populus fremontii), once the dominant native <br />riparian hardwood, with the hope that they will prevent the exotics from <br />becoming reestablished. The cottonwoods,- which expire much less water <br />than tamarisk, were decimated in the 1850s and '60s to supply fuel for <br />paddlewheel steamers that plied the lower Colorado. <br />Land in the Palo Verde and Imperial valleys is fertile, but high in <br />mineral content. The standard farming practice in these areas requires <br />large quantities of water to leach the soils and prevent accumulation of <br />minerals to levels harmful to crop production.. As a result, the water <br />in the main channel of the river is steadily increasing in dissolved <br />solids, and, as might be expected, the concentrations gradually increase <br />as one moves downstream. <br />Effects on Fish <br />As best we are able to determine, it appears that native fishes of the lower <br />river were able to maintain their numbers despite the inroads made on their <br />spawning populations by local settlers and farmers. There is some indication <br />that drought conditions in the early 1930's may have caused a decline_ of <br />the native fishes in the lower river during this period-(Dill 1944). Unfortunately, <br />the numbers of these fish was not monitored by biologists or others, so their <br />status in the lower river can only be inferred. Regardless of whether there <br />was in fact a drought-induced decline in the early 1930's, it is reasonably <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.