My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5001
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
5001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:34:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
5001
Author
Nicola, S. J.
Title
Fisheries Problems Associated With the Development of the Lower Colorado River.
USFW Year
1981.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />-11- <br />Nevertheless, it was only a matter of time before even larger water <br />development projects were undertaken. In 1928, the U. S. Congress <br />authorized legislation and appropriated funds to begin construction of what <br />is now known as Hoover Dam. Completed in 1936, it has an active storage <br />capacity equivalent to twice the annual discharge of the entire Colorado <br />River. Two more storage reservoirs soon followed: Parker Dam (Lake Havasu) <br />and Davis Dam (Lake Mohave) in 1938 and 1946, respectively. Hoover Dam <br />serves primarily to generate electricity and store winter runoff for <br />release into the downstream reservoirs. Water is diverted from Parker <br />Dam to the greater southern California metropolitan area where it now <br />provides a full or supplemental supply for nearly 11 million people. <br />Several smaller agricultural diversion dams have also been constructed, <br />including Morelos Dam below Yuma, so that at present eight major structures <br />(including Hoover Dam) span the river below Lake Mead. <br />Changes in the River <br />As is the case with most rivers in the north temperate zone, there is <br />usually a complete change following impoundment in-the temperature regime <br />below the dams. This is due to the fact that water is drawn from the reservoir <br />from the bottom layers, which in deep reservoi=s, remain cool during the <br />summer. Below Hoover and Davis dams, for example, the water temperature <br />remains close to 13°C throughout the year,. whereas prior to impoundment it <br />varied from 10°C to around 30°C. Parker Dam restores the natural temperature <br />regime to the river somewhat because Lake Havasu is shallower and lacks <br />the deep layer of cool water. <br />All three of these dams imparted more profound changes to the river than <br />their effects on temperature. The peak period of discharge was changed <br />from winter, as flood flows were brought under control, to the summer, as <br />stored water was released in large amounts during the agricultural growing <br />season. With large quantities of water being diverted from the river for <br />irrigation and domestic consumption, and with the reduction of flood flows, <br />silt accumulated in the river bed,. reducing the capacity of the river channel <br />and causing the water table along-the flood plain to rise. Compounding <br />this problem are the high and fluctuating summertime irrigation releases <br />which raise the water level as much as 5 feet, scouring the river bed <br />immediately below the reservoirs. The dislodged silt is deposited in the <br />channel downstream in areas where the flow decreased such as in backwaters <br />or at the upper ends of reservoir. <br />These man-caused changes in bedload hydrodynamics caused two major problems <br />shortly after completion of the major lower river dams--insufficient drainage <br />from irrigated fields, and flooding. The town of Needles was flooded by <br />the rising waters of Lake Havasu soon after the Parker Dam was completed. <br />Silt had settled out in the river channel in the vicinity of the town, <br />causing the impounded waters to back upstream farther than planned. While <br />the construction of Glen Canyon Dam and other large dams upstream from Lake <br />Mead have since virtually eliminated the threat of natural runoff exceeding <br />the storage capacity of the reservoirs, the problem of the degrading and <br />aggrading river channel remains to this day. To cope with this problem, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.