Laserfiche WebLink
-4- <br />longer. Management, approached as if the plans <br />were merely reform actions to solve specific <br />problems, with no subsequent interest in whether <br />management goals were achieved, is unacceptable. <br />Careful planning that incorporates ecosystem <br />principles accompanied by follow up monitoring <br />effort is essential. <br />If the Bureau of Reclamation seeks to alter its <br />mission from development to resource management, a <br />major revision in perspective and skill will be <br />required. A possible approach might include <br />establishing, among Department of Interior agencies <br />and leading scientists, an oversight group with the <br />necessary breadth of perspective to meld science <br />with natural resource management. <br />FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The committee's findings and recommendations <br />provide advice to the Department of the Interior <br />not only on the specific components of the GCES but <br />also for the design and conduct of future <br />environmental studies of a similar nature. These <br />brief abstracts of the major findings are followed <br />by recommendations in bold print. <br />Valuable New Information <br />The results of the GCES represent a substantial <br />increase in knowledge of the Colorado River <br />ecosystem as it exists in the Glen Canyon and the <br />Grand Canyon. Unfortunately, few data were <br />available to describe the character of the river <br />system prior to the closure of Glen Canyon Dam. <br />This will remain a major impediment to our full <br />understanding of the changes that have occurred as <br />a result of the construction of the dam, although <br />studying reaches of the Colorado not affected by <br />impoundment may give important clues. Thus, the <br />uncertainty about how the river continues to change <br />and how it might be managed will be higher than if <br />