Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br />GEOTHERMAL <br />DEVELOPMENT <br />Despite serious threats to world-famous geothermal <br />features in our parks, existing laws and regulations <br />provide only limited and inadequate protection. <br />Geysers and other geothermal features are among the <br />most unique and popular features of Yellowstone and <br />many other parks. Existing laws and regulations, <br />however, permit or inadequately regulate drilling to <br />tap geothermal or other mineral resources outside <br />park borders that could seriously harm park thermal <br />features. Recent experience in Nevada, California, <br />New Zealand and Iceland has shown that geysers can <br />be permanently silenced if their regional under- <br />ground plumbing systems are disturbed. Of the ten <br /> <br /> <br />Geysers and other thermal features at Yellowstone and other national parhs are threatened by subsurface drilling beyond parh boundaries. <br />30 <br />remaining major geyser basins in the world, all but <br />three have been harmed in recent years due to nearby <br />drilling. <br />In 1988, Congress amended the Geothermal <br />Steam Act18 to require the Secretary of Interior to <br />identify, study and monitor significant geothermal <br />resources in units of the National Park System and to <br />restrict geothermal leasing, exploration or develop- <br />ment that is likely to harm park resources. While the <br />1988 amendments represent an important step <br />towards protecting park geothermal features, they <br />leave parks vulnerable in significant ways. <br />To begin with, the legal standard governing <br />protection of parks under the Geothermal Steam Act <br />amendments is difficult to meet. Geothermal explo- <br />ration and development are allowed to proceed <br />unless the Secretary of Interior demonstrates that <br />"significant adverse effect" to park thermal features is <br />"reasonably likely." That standard leaves the parks at <br />risk because available scientific information and tech- <br />niques may not be adequate to support a confident <br />prediction that impacts are "reasonably likely." <br />~.~. <br /> <br />