Laserfiche WebLink
FOUR <br />Selecting a Strategy <br />to Guide Mediation <br />In Chapter One I presented several approaches to conflict <br />management and resolution. These spanned a continuum with <br />conflict avoidance at one extreme and physical violence at the <br />other. As one moved from left to right in the diagram (see Fig- <br />ure 1), the approaches became progressively more assertive and <br />coercive. My concern in this chapter is with the process people <br />use in conflict to select a particular approach or combination of <br />approaches along this continuum. Of particular concern is how <br />and under what circumstances people select mediated negotia- <br />tions as the principal way to manage or resolve conflict. <br />Selection of an arena is related to selection of a dispute <br />management approach. Arenas or locales vary according to the <br />degrees of several dimensions: publicness and privacy, informaI- <br />ity and formality, institutionalization and noninstitutionaliza- <br />tion, and voluntariness and coercion. Any given approach can <br />be acted out in a variety of arenas. For example, mediation can <br />occur in a private setting that is informal, voluntary, and un- <br />institutionalized-as in child custody and divorce settlements. <br />Mediation can also be conducted in a highly public setting with <br />standardized behaviors and rituals. An example of large-scale <br />public negotiations is the Negotiated Investment Strategy ses- <br />sions sponsored by the Kettering Foundation that enabled fed- <br />eral, state, and city agencies to develop coordinated policies on <br />issues ranging from site-specific land use matters to citywide <br />social service policies (Shanahan and others, 1982). <br />61 <br />