Laserfiche WebLink
How Mediation Works 35 <br />tor's choice of intervention moves, it is important to distinguish <br />between a mediator assisting in recognizing, organizing, and <br />marshaling existing power of a disputant and a mediator becom- <br />ing an advocate and assisting in generating new power. and influ- <br />ence. The latter strategy clearly shifts the mediator out of his or <br />her impartial position, while the former keeps the mediator <br />within the power boundaries established by the parties. There is <br />no easy answer to this strategic and ethical problem, but it does <br />have an important impact on the types of moves a mediator <br />initiates. <br />Negotiation Procedures. Negotiation is a form of joint <br />problem solving. The topical problems that negotiators focus on <br />are often called issues. An issue exists because the parties do not <br />agree on a particular topic and because they have perceived or <br />actual exclusive needs or interests. <br />In the Singson-Whittamore case described in Chapter One, <br />the issues about which the two people will negotiate include: <br />(1) Can Whittamore continue to practice medicine in a town in <br />which he wishes to live? (2) Will there be a penalty for breaking <br />the contract? (3} If there is a penalty, how much will it be? (4) <br />How will the penalty be calculated, and what factors should be <br />considered? (5) Is there a way that Whittamore can stay at the <br />clinic and still maintain some distance from his estranged wife? <br />(This, after all, is the crux of the problem.) Note that the fram- <br />ing, or description, of the issues above is in neutral terms that <br />favor neither party, and that the wording describes a problem to <br />be solved rather than a particular alternative to be forced by <br />one bargainer on another. <br />Parties to a conflict select one of two major negotiation <br />procedures to handle issues in dispute: positional bargaining or <br />interest-based bargaining (Fisher and Ury, 1981). Positional bar- <br />gaining usually occurs when a negotiator perceives that con- <br />tested resources are limited and a distributive solution, one that <br />allocates shares of gains and losses to each party, is the only <br />possible outcome (Walton and McKersie, 1965). Interest-based <br />bargaining, on the other hand, occurs when negotiators seek <br />integrative solutions that meet as many of the needs of both <br />parties as possible (Walton and McKersie, 1965). Generally, <br />