Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:318-326, 1998 <br />American Fisheries Society 1998 <br />Use of Multiple Spawning Sites and Seasonal Movement by <br />Razorback Suckers in the Middle Green River, Utah <br />TIMOTHY MODDE* AND DAVID B. IRVING <br />Colorado River Fish Project, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />266 West 100 North, Suite 2, Vernal, Utah 84078, USA <br />Abstract.-Radiotelemetry data through three successive spawning events (1993-1995) and cap- <br />ture data for 15 years (1975, 1979-1993) were used to describe movement patterns and fidelity <br />to spawning sites by male razorback suckers Xyrauchen texanus in the middle Green River, Utah. <br />Movement to spawning areas was influenced primarily by discharge. The greatest distances traveled <br />by male razorback suckers were in a downstream direction and occurred just before and shortly <br />after spawning. Three of six surviving males implanted with radio transmitters were located on <br />more than one spawning site between 1993 and 1995. Thus, although most razorback suckers in <br />the middle Green River spawned in a single area between river kilometers 492 and 501 (from the <br />confluence of the Green and the Colorado rivers), other spawning areas were probably used. Tag <br />recapture and telemetry data supported the hypothesis that razorback suckers in the middle Green <br />River represent a single reproductive population. <br />.~ <br />Razorback suckers Xyrauchen texanus occupy <br />large riverine habitats and are endemic to the Col- <br />orado River basin. As with many large endemic <br />species occupying the main tributaries of the Col- <br />orado River basin, the razorback sucker is a long- <br />lived species that reaches ages older than 40 years <br />(McCarthy and Minckley 1987). Populations of <br />razorback sucker in the lower basin of the upper <br />Colorado River once supported a commercial fish- <br />ery but declined dramatically following the com- <br />pletion of major impoundments (Minckley et al. <br />1991). This decline was attributed to a lack of <br />successful recruitment (Minckley et al. 1991). <br />Lack of recruitment has been attributed to a loss <br />of floodplain nursery habitat resulting from sub- <br />stantially reduced peak flows (Tyus and Karp <br />1990; Modde et al. 1995) and negative interactions <br />with exotic fishes that have become established in <br />altered riverine environments (Marsh and Brooks <br />1989; Minckley et al. 1991). Because of major <br />environmental changes, riverine razorback suckers <br />have nearly disappeared from the lower Colorado <br />River basin, and only a small population exists in <br />the upper Colorado River basin (Minckley et al. <br />1991; Modde et al. 1996). In response to popu- <br />lation declines and habitat loss,. the razorback <br />sucker was listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service as an endangered species in 1991 (USFWS <br />1991). <br />The largest population of razorback suckers oc- <br />cupying exclusively riverine habitat in the Colo- <br />rado River basin is located in the middle Green <br />* Corresponding author: tim_modde@fws.gov <br />~~L~ <br />River between the confluence of the White and <br />Yampa rivers (Lanigan and Tyus 1989). Population <br />size, estimated to be less than 500 individuals <br />(Modde et al. 1996), declined following construc- <br />tion of Flaming Gorge Dam (1964) on the Green <br />River, 110 km upstream of the confluence of the <br />Yampa River. The influence of Flaming Gorge <br />Dam has reduced both variation and magnitude of <br />flows in the Green River (Tyus and Karp 1989) <br />and reduced the historic river channel width and <br />sediment transport (Andrews 1986). Because ra- <br />zorback suckers migrate to specific spawning areas <br />on the ascending limb of the hydrograph (Tyus <br />1987; Tyus and Karp 1990), changes in the natural <br />hydrograph may affect the ability of fish to form <br />spawning aggregations. <br />Because of its small population (Modde et al. <br />1996), augmentation efforts have been proposed <br />for the middle Green River population (Biology <br />Committee 1995). Concerns related to augmen- <br />tation activity require information on potential ge- <br />netic isolation (Modde et al. 1995). Tyus and Karp <br />(1990) suggested that razorback suckers show fi- <br />delity to two spawning areas, the Escalante (Jen- <br />sen, Utah) and Yampa River sites. If fish show <br />fidelity to both spawning sites, genetic isolation <br />occurs and broodstock should be developed for <br />both populations. If fidelity were not a factor, then <br />a single population would exist and broodstock for <br />introduction efforts could be mixed. <br />This study describes razorback sucker move- <br />ment before and after spawning. Movement of six <br />male razorback suckers was monitored by means <br />of radiotelemetry between three spawning events <br />and compared with temperature and dischazge. In <br />318 <br />