Laserfiche WebLink
except in <br />ilted from <br />derground <br />Nany such <br />sometimes <br />sands and <br />elsewhere <br />cast; when <br />-ermanent, <br />e channels <br />~ dammed <br />k, organic <br />.es" in the <br />(Martin & <br />ottonwood <br />4), were <br />ainage, or <br />sat success <br />e present, <br />ions, much <br />tuts would <br />e tortuous <br />tal (Fig. 5). <br />afore, with <br />1, 6), orig- <br />r erosional <br />area, and <br />factor like <br />Arizona at <br />9 <br />o~ ~ <br />t. <br />f~- ~. ~ . .,~. ~ - `"~` ~ , <br />i ., P~ b ~' <br />%x: <br />~~ ~ j <br />r ; :. <br />s <br />~ .y, ~ .. ' <br />.~~ ;~ <br />~~ <br />.R...--~.~ r~ .. <br />Figure 7. Tributary to the White River, Apache County, Arizonan high-elevation cienega <br />conditions interspersed with riparian gallery forests of confers and various deciduous <br />trees, ca. 2,500 m above mean sea level. <br />least, severe over-grazing by domestic livestock in the period ] 870-90 <br />resulted in death of about 75 per cent of the herd when prolonged <br />drought grasped the region in 1891-94. Effects of this catastrophe on <br />the land and the terrestrial vegetation are vividly documented by paired <br />photographs published by Hastings and Turner, which contrast the late <br />1800s with the 1960s. There can be little doubt that aquatic habitats, and <br />fishes, also were severely influenced (Hastings, 1959; Miller, 1961 b; <br />MiTickley, ] 969a). <br />Streams at intermediate and higher altitudes in Arizona, except <br />in the south, remain far less disturbed than larger rivers and the other, <br />lower-elevation waters. This is a result, at least in part, of lesser damage <br />by man to the surrounding terrain, on 'Indian lands where developers <br />are just beginning to encroach, and on public lands that must be main- <br />tained as the watershed to supply needs of the exploding human popu- <br />lations of lower elevations. Also, because of their higher gradient and <br />the seasonality of precipitation and flood, the riparian or stream-side <br />vegetation along such watercourses may well be more resilient to dis- <br />ruption, undergoing a perpetual succession (Campbell & Green, 1968) <br />of sorts. In addition, much intermediate- to higher-elevation waters in <br />Arizona are intensively managed for recreational purposes, principally <br />sport fishing and some of the more "natural" streams therefore persist. <br />The highest elevation brooks and creeks support trouts. They are cold, <br />swift, and turbulent, relatively infertile, and clear, surrounded by coni- <br />ferous forest and in some areas extensive galleries of deciduous trees <br />(Fig. 7). At intermediate elevations the creeks are more similar to those <br />down-st-som <br />