Laserfiche WebLink
106 <br />PARENTS 3 i <br />5 <br />F1 <br />Offspring <br />FIGURE 2.-Diagram of the di-allele crossbreeding strategy for maintaining genetic diversity and developing razorback <br />sucker broodstock in the upper Colorado River basin. <br />production and reintroduction of progeny into suit- <br />able habitat to augment declining or restore self- <br />sustaining razorback sucker populations. Managing <br />captive populations to maximize genetic diversity <br />preserves future options for effective management <br />and recovery of the taxon (Ralls and Ballou 1992). <br />Razorback sucker populations most threatened by <br />extinction provide a management opportunity and <br />priority for establishing AGRs or gene banks. <br />AGRs provide a refuge of genetic material in the <br />event a natural catastrophe destroys a majority of <br />the wild stock. <br />Except for Lake Mohave in the lower basin and <br />the middle Green River in the upper basin, accurate <br />population estimates do not exist for razorback <br />sucker populations. Nevertheless, monitoring data <br />suggest that the razorback sucker population in the <br />upper Colorado River basin is small. Therefore, a <br />di-allele crossbreeding system (Williamson and <br />Wydoski 1994) is being used to develop AGR pop- <br />ulations for the upper Colorado River basin (Figure <br />2). This crossbreeding system is particularly valu- <br />able when the total number of adults available is <br />small and the contribution of each individual is <br />critical to maintaining population characteristics. A <br />di-allele mating strategy ensures production of ev- <br />ery genotypic combination possible among the few <br />fish. Each fish is genetically represented in the next <br />generation in five unique lots, thus greatly increas- <br />ing the likelihood of preserving allelic diversity in <br />MODDE ET AL. <br />PARENTS <br />A B C D E <br />7cI <br />the offspring of the captive stock (Williamson and <br />Wydoski 1994). The matrix produces 25 half-sibling <br />family lots; the five lots along the diagonal are <br />unique (i.e., unrelated). They provide the matrix <br />core. The remaining family lots provide security of <br />parental contribution through time in the event of a <br />loss of a unique lot. The number of adults used in <br />the matrix is arbitrary; however, any number much <br />beyond five males and five females becomes un- <br />wieldy and the utility of the di-allele matrix ques- <br />tionable. After the F1 broodstock has been devel- <br />oped from the five by five cross, additional wild fish <br />will be used to supplement the genetic component <br />of the original founders when available. <br />Stocking <br />The goal of razorback sucker stocking is to assist <br />the establishment of naturally sustainable popula- <br />tions while posing a minimum risk to the endemic <br />fish population. The widespread stocking of mil- <br />lions of razorback sucker in the lower Colorado <br />River basin during 1981-1987 has produced disap- <br />pointing results (Minckley et al. 1991), and the <br />stocking of 6,400 advanced fingerling razorback <br />suckers in the middle Green River during 1987- <br />1989 has failed to produce a single recapture (U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado River Fish <br />Project, unpublished data). However, these stock- <br />ing efforts were initiated without habitat modifica-