My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8234
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:22:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8234
Author
Marsh, P. C. and M. E. Douglas
Title
Predation by Introduced Fishes on Endangered Humpback Chub and Other Native Species in the Little Colorado River, Arizona
USFW Year
1997
USFW - Doc Type
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />228 <br /> <br />t <br />A <br />RK 184.6 <br />Kenney Reservoir <br />RK 167 8 RK 176.9 <br />Rangley <br />Taylor Draw Dam <br />RK 115.5 <br />Rio Blanco Lake <br />RK 243 <br />NYONING <br />60 S <br />YDouglas Creek Piceance Creek <br />? Utah Colorado 30 <br />kilometers Utah Colorado <br /> <br />Fig. 1. White River/Kenney Reservoir study area. River kilometers (RK) are demarcated from the confluence of the White and Green <br />rivers in Utah (see inset). <br />Introduction <br />Dams and reservoirs have had profound effects on <br />the ecology of the Colorado River system (Mullan <br />et al. 1976, Stanford & Ward 1986a, b, c). Its endemic <br />fishes have beer. negatively affected by modifica- <br />tions resulting from impoundments (Behnke & <br />Benson,' Hickman 1983, Holden & Stalnaker 1975, <br />Miller 1946,1961, Minckley & Deacon 1968, Tyus et <br />al. 1982, Vanicek et al. 1970). Further, competition <br />with non-native fish species, many of which thrived <br />in the modified environments within and down- <br />stream from reservoirs, may also have contributed <br />to the decline of native species (Stanford & Ward <br />t986c). Effects of damming a river have been classi- <br />fied as immediate and delayed (Holden 1979). Im- <br />mediate effects include those that become apparent <br />when a dam becomes operational. Delayed effects <br />become evident several years after dam completion <br />Behnke. R.J. & D.E. Benson. 1980. Endangered and threat- <br />ened fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Cooperative Ex- <br />tension Service Bulletin 503A. Colorado State University. Fort <br />Collins. 34 pp. <br />(Holden 1979). The closure of Taylor Draw dam on <br />the main stem White River in October 1984, proved <br />to have both immediate and delayed impacts on the <br />river's fish community. <br />Immediate effects included blockage of up- <br />stream migration to 80 km of river known to con- <br />tain Colorado squawfish Ptychocedus lucius (Mar- <br />tinez,'` Chart 1986), a large piscivorous minnow list- <br />ed as endangered by the U.S. Department of the In- <br />terior. Summertime aggregations of adult Colorado <br />squawfish below the dam following its closure were <br />believed to be composed of post-spawners return- <br />ing to home ranges from spawning sites in the <br />Green and Yampa rivers. The death of several of <br />these adult fish in 1985 due to angling activity below <br />the dam prompted an emergency regulation pro- <br />hibiting angling in this area (Martinez). <br />In addition to these immediate effects on Colora- <br />do squawfish, the fish community of the White Riv- <br />er also experienced both immediate and delayed <br />' Martinez. P.J.1986. White River Taylor Draw Project pre- and <br />postimpoundment fish community investigations. Colorado Di- <br />vision of Wildlife. Fort Collins. 121 pp.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.