Laserfiche WebLink
<br />? <br />0 O.e n.g ; <br />o tt ? ORTH- ; <br />U t , i <br />0.6 BOVEE 06 <br />t / <br />? I <br />C7 ' , <br />Z 0.4- +--ORTH OA ' r <br />C7 i / t <br />W 0.2- 02 I <br />BOVEE <br />0 30 `60 90 120 150 O 30 60 90 120 50 <br />VELOCITY (cm/s) DEPTH (cm) <br />Fir,. 1. Comparison of velocity and depth preference curves for the adult snralltnouth bass from Bowe <br />(1978) (solid lines) and Orth ( 1980) (broken lines). Orth used the term weighting factor. and Bovee used <br />probability. <br />day to day, day versus night. and in response to prey-predators. <br />etc. (Emery 1973; Helfman 1981; Fraser and Emmons 1984). <br />Yet the total number of fish in a stream usually does not change <br />over the period of observations on these normal behavioral <br />responses. It is important for investigators, therefore, to dis- <br />tinguish between distribution (occurrence of a life stage at a <br />location) and abundance (absolute or relative size) of a fish <br />population at a stream reach. <br />A careful evaluation of,the usability of a "preference" or <br />"suitability" curve is necessary. The shape of the curve can he <br />highl% dependent on the site, stream, and time of collection. <br />Consider the velocity and depth suitability curves developed <br />using a similar method for the adult srnallrnouth bass from two <br />different sources in Fig. I . No resemblance is evident, and the <br />optimum "preferred" or "suitable" depth and velocity differ by <br />an order of ma nitude between curves for each variable. <br />rte tanv aceace.1I n ie"{lev lop eat f' re <br />e cecurve rs-tha t e - _ btained. 6onitV eWIalte ;stream <br />a 1 ? cis ee f Z . , uc icon i(ions are rare, at <br />best, especially for high-quality habitats. It is also rare that <br />before initiating a study that the investigators know the carrying <br />capacity of streams or that of a given stretch within a stream. <br />Note Drat only when a suhstantial positive correlation is oh- <br />tained between WUA and fish biomass a posteriori is the fish <br />population considered to be at carrying capacity (Orth and <br />Maughan 1982). <br />Assungptum q independc•nee <br />The derivation of «'UA is based on the assumption that <br />organisms select each habitat variable independently of the <br />other variable(s), Examination of the published analysis shows <br />violation of this assumption. Ill table 1 of Orth and Maughan <br />(1982) Ilse inteviclion lean fur depth r velocity was highly <br />significant (P < 0.01) in three of file four analyses presented. <br />Interaction exists where two factors combine to produce an <br />added effect not due to one of them alone; neither factor <br />individually can show the "best" predictor to optimize the <br />habitat. That is, the suitability of a given depth may depend <br />upon velocity. For example, in the case of central stoneroller, <br />Campostonta anotnalmn. the interaction of depth and velocity <br />explained about 30% of the known variation in abundance of' <br />fish during spring. None of the other variables were significant. <br />Because the two variables (depth and veloci(y) are highly <br />interactive they may not be used to calculate unbiased estimates <br />of WUA under the assumption of independence. <br />Orth and Maughan (1982) belie-,ed this interaction would be <br />of limited significance on their minimum flow reconunenda- <br />tions; a preference for greater depths at greater velocities would <br />be observed. Using the exponential multiple regression models <br />given by Orth and Maughan 0 982) in their table 4, we estimated <br />the response surface for densities of adult central stnneroller <br />at various depths and velocities (Fig. 2). The effe, rs of sir, <br />depth-velocity interaction are obvious; fish densities in,:r.a,: <br />radically with a slight increase in either depth or velocity .Ili h <br />densities of central stoneroller will occur (according to the <br />model) at very low- velocities and ;halloo, depths. In fact. this <br />model suggests that highest densities will occur at no flow. an <br />illogical conclusion that can result when assumption of indepen- <br />dent selection of variables is not met. The violation of the <br />assumption of independen,.e may be more universal than might <br />have been previously believed. Studies by Gore and.ltdfy (1981, <br />and Orth and Maughan 0 983) on benthic organisms also shoe <br />the violation of assumption of independence- =Ai any rate, <br />because depth and velocity are correlated in a.s(re's n (Fraser <br />1972), it is diffrcull to nwaningfull) ascertain in the field that the' <br />,?elcction of one habitat variable by fish is independent of the <br />other variable- <br />The basic foundation of 11-IM is the calculation of-WUA at <br />iltcrementa flows and assume. a positive linear reletinn4011 <br />Cm,. J. Fish. Aquat. 5cl.. Vol. 42. 14.rt 82' <br />As%umption of Po.0ive Linear Rolationship of IVU.t and <br />Standing Crop