Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sin 40c/; <br />E ?Jfl NOTES <br />0 <br />A Critique of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology <br />Rl1C-`.fudd% Run. Ecological Labonrtor. 11.U Box 10, Drumore, PA t-; 1`1. t;SA <br />William f L Bason <br />Ln?7?-Ir? <br />Delmarva Ecnfoeical Laboratory, Inc.. R 0 I M-x 286, Middletown. Of. "i-t'9. USA <br />'I P KNAf Edmund (. Purdy, Jr. <br />Op, Phi!advIp.hi,I Electric Company, 2301 Vari.et 1?t-eet, Philadelphia, PA I(I10F. ( ISA <br />and Carl A Silver <br />Depardnent of Statistics, Drexel UnP,enit Philadelphia, PA 1911)1. (';:l <br />Mathur, D., \•V. H. Bason, E. I. Purdy, Jr., and C. A. Silver. 1985, A critique of the Instream Flow Inc emental <br />Methodology. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42: 825 831. <br />A review and reanalysis of the published literature show that several assumptions are violated in the <br />application of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) without consideration of the implica- <br />tions of so doing. The fundamental assumption of a positive linear relation hip between 'potential <br />available habitat" MUM and biomass of fish has neither been documented riot- validated, partic. ularly in <br />warmwater streams. Absence of correlation precludes prediction of changes in fist, populations. In some <br />studies the test of this assumption appears to be equivalent to a calibration operation. The other <br />assumption violated includes independent selection of habitat variables by fish. The presence of signi- <br />ficant interaction among habitat variables can affect tht stream flow recommendations. mother problem <br />exists in application of Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM): one WUA unit should not be interpreted as <br />being equal to another in biological production or habitat value unless sho,vn to be an exact replica. <br />Several combinations of physical variables could give rise to the same amount of 1VUA, none of which may <br />be correlated to the biomass of fish. The utilization, suitability, or preference cu,ves should not be treated <br />as probability functions; a rating of 1.0 is not equivalent to probability of 1.0. Care should be taken to <br />distinguish between real behavioral preferences of fishes based on distributional occurrence from <br />abundance (relative or absolute size) in a stream. <br />Lin examen et une anahse des ouvrages publics montrent que plusieurs hypoth6ses sont refutes Bans <br />I'application de la misthode IFIM (u Instream Flow Incremental Methodology )) sans consideration des <br />repercussions. Uhypothese fondamentale selon laquelle it existe une relation lineaire positive entre <br />I'habitat potentiel disponible (WUA) et la biomasse des poissons n'a pas etc etudiee ni protrvee, en <br />particulier clans les tours d'eau chaude. L'absence de correlation empeche la prediction de variations clans <br />les populations de poisson. Dans certaines etudes, la verification de cette hypoth@se semble et; a equiva- <br />lente A un exercice d'etalonnage. Le choix indepenclanl par les poissons des variables de I'habitat constitue <br />tine autre refutation de Phypothese. La presence dime interaction importance entre les variables de <br />I'habitat peut influer sur les recommandations en matiere de debit. II existe aLISSi Lin autre problenie dans <br />I'applicalion fit- PI-IA1351M (« Physical Habitat Simulation u) : pour cc qui est de la production biologigUe et <br />de la valetir de. I'hahitat, deLIX unites WUA no doivcnt i•tre considWes t'g ilvs oluc si Mlles sort des copies <br />exacles. 1'lusirurs tomhinaisons de variables physirlue? pviivent produire Irti mt mcs val,,urs V1'tW dent <br />our uric West Iwid-r•tre <:o c orr(Amion avec la bimnastiw des poissum. Les (%)ur ht •. dOxivanl I'utilisation, la <br />convenance tint la preference ne devraient pas titre trait6es comme des frnu lions de probahilile : une <br />evaluation s'elevant A 1,0 nest pas equivalente a une probability de 1,0. I.a distinction entre les vrait s <br />prOdsrences comportement ales des poissons basees Stir la frequence de la reparlition et I'ahondance <br />(relative ou absolue) clans on tours d'eau devra faire I'uhjet d'une attention parliculiere. <br />Received luly.3, 1984 Resu /e 3 juillet 1984 <br />Accepted December 31, 1984 Ar(ehte le 31 decemhre 1984 <br />117857) <br />d??31 <br />Can. J. Fish. Aqurrt. Sri.. Vol. 12. 1985 825