My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7311
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:20:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7311
Author
McCarthy, M. S. and W. L. Minckley
Title
Age Estimation for Razorback Sucker (Pisces
USFW Year
1987
USFW - Doc Type
Catostomidae) from Lake Mohave, Arizona and Nevada
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
92 <br />A <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF THE ARIZONA-NEVADA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE <br />D <br />VOL. 21 <br />Figure 4. A. Diagrammatic illustration of sectioned sagitta of a razorback sucker 34 years old by otolith section caught <br />from Lake Mohave, Arizona and Nevada (scale, mm). B. Photograph of the enclosed section of A, showing presumed <br />annular marks (70X). C. Photograph (30X) of sectioned sagitta of a 3-year-old, hatchery-produced, pond-reared razorback <br />sucker from DNFH. D. Detail of C (100X), showing 2 annular marks. <br />from radii of otolith annuli since sagitta radius in razorback Early growth of Lake Mohave fish calculated from <br />sucker was highly correlated with SL at capture (r2 = 0.97 sectioned otoliths were consistent with and of the same <br />for 1og10 transformed data; Figure 5). Individual growth magnitudes of variation as in comparable-aged hatchery <br />histories Figure 6) were constructed on the assumptions stocks at DNFH for which size frequencies are available <br />that Lake Mohave specimens were accurately aged and that (Table 2). All wild-caught fish showed similar patterns over <br />otolith annulusiSL relationships for hatchery fish are the time (Figure 6). First year growth computed from pre- <br />same as for wild-caught specimens of the same (small) sizes. sumed annuli averaged 26.7±0.8% of SL at capture in <br />B
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.