ISSUE 2, 1987 AGE ESTIMATION FOR RAZORBACK SUCKER 91
<br />ently deflected medially between 4 to 6 years of otolith age
<br />to produce an imperfect cup shape. The incomplete rim
<br />became directed mesoventrally to surround a distinct
<br />sulcus, the floor of which demonstrated less accretion than
<br />other parts.
<br />Only sectioned otoliths provided clear, apparent indica-
<br />tions of annual growth for razorback sucker. Seventy-four
<br />(84.1%) of 88 fish examined showed marks readily inter-
<br />pretable as annuli (Fig. 4). An unreadable percentage resulted
<br />from breakage during preparation (2.3%), section through
<br />other than the structural focus (3.4%), or aber-
<br />rantly irregular growth of margins (10.2°/x).
<br />A
<br />B
<br />Figure 3. A. Medial aspect of left sagitta from a razorback
<br />sucker caught from Lake Mohave, Arizona and Nevada, 34
<br />years of age by otolith section. B. Lateral aspect of same
<br />sagitta, showing inner arch (both 15X).
<br />Age Estimation from Sectioned Otoliths
<br />Otolith growth, as with that of other bony structures
<br />in fishes, is by accumulation of material at periodically
<br />variable rates. Accretion is believed under endocrine con-
<br />trol, following circadian rhythms of that system, which in
<br />turn may be attuned to photoperiod, temperature, or other
<br />environmental variations (Jacket 1981). Otoliths are con-
<br />sidered more conservative than other bony structures in
<br />response (e.g., reabsorption) in times of stress such as lack
<br />of food (Marshall and Parker 1982, Campana 1983a),
<br />physical exertion (Campana 1983b), or low pH (teen et al.
<br />1985). Seasonal growth is established by greater accretion
<br />in summer and less in winter (Irie 1960, Pannella 1971,
<br />Williams and Bradford 1974, Liew 1974, Tauber and Coble
<br />1977, Campana and Neilson 1985). Conditions in warm-
<br />monomictic reservoirs such as Lake Mohave (Priscu 1978,
<br />Paulson et al. 1980, Priscu et al. 19821 should be conducive
<br />to otolith annulus formation, as the pristine Colorado River
<br />must also have been due to marked seasonal variation in
<br />water temperature (Minckley 1979).
<br />Postlarval razorback sucker have otoliths visible under
<br />dissecting LM when 10 mm long (Minckley and Gustafson
<br />19821. The structures were well developed and a focus
<br />sharply defined in YOY from DNFH, as was marginal
<br />growth on a generally horizontal plane through the fourth
<br />to sixth years in older hatchery fish. However, expansion
<br />was greatest anteriorly, posteriorly, and dorsolaterally, and
<br />less mesoventrally, to result (as in wild fish) in an incipient
<br />cup shape. A fragile inner arch anterior to the sagittal body
<br />was visible in YOY, seemingly grew at a lesser rate than
<br />the margins, and had circuli unequal in number (usually
<br />fewer) to those on the sagittal body. It was typically broken
<br />during preparation.
<br />Intact and readable sagittae of wild-caught razorback
<br />sucker all had 23 or more distinct marks (24 if the margin
<br />is considered a last annulus) interpretable as annuli. The
<br />greatest apparent age based on unquestioned, continuous
<br />marks across the otolith section, was 44 years, considering
<br />the margin as the last annulus. If these represent absolute
<br />ages, individuals comprising the sample of 70 fish in Figure
<br />6 originated between 1937 and 1958, and 62 (88.6%) hatched
<br />prior to or coincident with construction and filling (1942-54)
<br />of Lake Mohave.
<br />Our data on longevity and years of recruitment are
<br />supported by a 52.4 cm SL male collected in 1976 from the
<br />lower Colorado River estimated by otolith (asteriscus)
<br />examination to be 22 years old (hatched ca. 1954), and
<br />another 60 cm long (presumably TL [ca. 47 mm SL], no sex
<br />given, collected in 19711 that had 17 annuli (also hatched
<br />near 1954) (age determined by the late John E. Fitch,
<br />CADFG, fide. James A. St. Amant, in McAda and Wydoski
<br />[1980] and in litt. 1976). Evidence of consistently slow
<br />growth in large adults in the upper Colorado basin is
<br />provided by an absence of detectable growth in a tagged
<br />adult (length unreported) over a period of 1.5 years and
<br />only a 2.3 mm annual increment in another individual (39.8
<br />mm TL at tagging) over 3.5 years (McAda and Wydoski
<br />1980). Tyus (1987) further demonstrated an average
<br />annual growth of only 2.2 mm for 39 tagged and recaptured
<br />razorback sucker over a period of 1 to 8 years in Green River,
<br />Utah. Rapid initial growth followed by a decline to annual
<br />increments of 1.0 cm or less has been reported for many
<br />other catostomids (Houser 1969, Beamish and Harvey 1969,
<br />Beamish 1973, MacCrimmon 1979, Beamish and McFarlane
<br />1983, Sigler et al. 1985). Cui-ui (Chasmistes cujus) in
<br />Pyramid Lake, Nevada, essentially cease to grow after they
<br />attain 20 years of age (Scoppettone et al. 1986).
<br />Otolith growth in fishes generally parallels that of the
<br />body as a whole, which is the basis of their use in age and
<br />growth studies (Dunkelberger et al. 1980, Mugiya et al.
<br />1981, Mugiya 1984). Standard lengths were back-calculated
|