Laserfiche WebLink
ISSUE 2, 1987 AGE ESTIMATION FOR RAZORBACK SUCKER 91 <br />ently deflected medially between 4 to 6 years of otolith age <br />to produce an imperfect cup shape. The incomplete rim <br />became directed mesoventrally to surround a distinct <br />sulcus, the floor of which demonstrated less accretion than <br />other parts. <br />Only sectioned otoliths provided clear, apparent indica- <br />tions of annual growth for razorback sucker. Seventy-four <br />(84.1%) of 88 fish examined showed marks readily inter- <br />pretable as annuli (Fig. 4). An unreadable percentage resulted <br />from breakage during preparation (2.3%), section through <br />other than the structural focus (3.4%), or aber- <br />rantly irregular growth of margins (10.2°/x). <br />A <br />B <br />Figure 3. A. Medial aspect of left sagitta from a razorback <br />sucker caught from Lake Mohave, Arizona and Nevada, 34 <br />years of age by otolith section. B. Lateral aspect of same <br />sagitta, showing inner arch (both 15X). <br />Age Estimation from Sectioned Otoliths <br />Otolith growth, as with that of other bony structures <br />in fishes, is by accumulation of material at periodically <br />variable rates. Accretion is believed under endocrine con- <br />trol, following circadian rhythms of that system, which in <br />turn may be attuned to photoperiod, temperature, or other <br />environmental variations (Jacket 1981). Otoliths are con- <br />sidered more conservative than other bony structures in <br />response (e.g., reabsorption) in times of stress such as lack <br />of food (Marshall and Parker 1982, Campana 1983a), <br />physical exertion (Campana 1983b), or low pH (teen et al. <br />1985). Seasonal growth is established by greater accretion <br />in summer and less in winter (Irie 1960, Pannella 1971, <br />Williams and Bradford 1974, Liew 1974, Tauber and Coble <br />1977, Campana and Neilson 1985). Conditions in warm- <br />monomictic reservoirs such as Lake Mohave (Priscu 1978, <br />Paulson et al. 1980, Priscu et al. 19821 should be conducive <br />to otolith annulus formation, as the pristine Colorado River <br />must also have been due to marked seasonal variation in <br />water temperature (Minckley 1979). <br />Postlarval razorback sucker have otoliths visible under <br />dissecting LM when 10 mm long (Minckley and Gustafson <br />19821. The structures were well developed and a focus <br />sharply defined in YOY from DNFH, as was marginal <br />growth on a generally horizontal plane through the fourth <br />to sixth years in older hatchery fish. However, expansion <br />was greatest anteriorly, posteriorly, and dorsolaterally, and <br />less mesoventrally, to result (as in wild fish) in an incipient <br />cup shape. A fragile inner arch anterior to the sagittal body <br />was visible in YOY, seemingly grew at a lesser rate than <br />the margins, and had circuli unequal in number (usually <br />fewer) to those on the sagittal body. It was typically broken <br />during preparation. <br />Intact and readable sagittae of wild-caught razorback <br />sucker all had 23 or more distinct marks (24 if the margin <br />is considered a last annulus) interpretable as annuli. The <br />greatest apparent age based on unquestioned, continuous <br />marks across the otolith section, was 44 years, considering <br />the margin as the last annulus. If these represent absolute <br />ages, individuals comprising the sample of 70 fish in Figure <br />6 originated between 1937 and 1958, and 62 (88.6%) hatched <br />prior to or coincident with construction and filling (1942-54) <br />of Lake Mohave. <br />Our data on longevity and years of recruitment are <br />supported by a 52.4 cm SL male collected in 1976 from the <br />lower Colorado River estimated by otolith (asteriscus) <br />examination to be 22 years old (hatched ca. 1954), and <br />another 60 cm long (presumably TL [ca. 47 mm SL], no sex <br />given, collected in 19711 that had 17 annuli (also hatched <br />near 1954) (age determined by the late John E. Fitch, <br />CADFG, fide. James A. St. Amant, in McAda and Wydoski <br />[1980] and in litt. 1976). Evidence of consistently slow <br />growth in large adults in the upper Colorado basin is <br />provided by an absence of detectable growth in a tagged <br />adult (length unreported) over a period of 1.5 years and <br />only a 2.3 mm annual increment in another individual (39.8 <br />mm TL at tagging) over 3.5 years (McAda and Wydoski <br />1980). Tyus (1987) further demonstrated an average <br />annual growth of only 2.2 mm for 39 tagged and recaptured <br />razorback sucker over a period of 1 to 8 years in Green River, <br />Utah. Rapid initial growth followed by a decline to annual <br />increments of 1.0 cm or less has been reported for many <br />other catostomids (Houser 1969, Beamish and Harvey 1969, <br />Beamish 1973, MacCrimmon 1979, Beamish and McFarlane <br />1983, Sigler et al. 1985). Cui-ui (Chasmistes cujus) in <br />Pyramid Lake, Nevada, essentially cease to grow after they <br />attain 20 years of age (Scoppettone et al. 1986). <br />Otolith growth in fishes generally parallels that of the <br />body as a whole, which is the basis of their use in age and <br />growth studies (Dunkelberger et al. 1980, Mugiya et al. <br />1981, Mugiya 1984). Standard lengths were back-calculated