My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7022
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:20:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7022
Author
Mayden, R. L., W. J. Rainboth and D. G. Buth
Title
Phylogenetic Systematics of the Cyprinid Genera
USFW Year
1991
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
828 COMA, 1991, NO. 3 <br />V IATE ANALYSIS OF STANDA RDIZED PCA SC ORES OF MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARD- <br />TABLE 4. CANONICAL AR <br />s are the results of an <br />f CVA loadin alyses with dorsal-fin rays included and <br />IZED COUNTS. The two <br />omitted. g <br />sets o <br />The same set of standardized PCA scores w as used for each analysis. <br /> Canonical vector loadings <br /> First analysis Second analysis <br />Character <br />1 <br />2 <br />1 <br />2 <br />PCA axis 1 0.13175 -0.02654 0.29673 0.04392 <br />43603 <br />-0 <br />PCA axis 2 0.80062 -1.02306 1.46241 <br />23940 <br />1 . <br />0.73585 <br />PCA axis 3 0.62336 <br />52598 <br />0 -1.27442 <br />-0.39820 . <br />0.92915 -0.97829 <br />PCA axis 4 <br />PCA axis 5 . <br />0.08375 -0.38383 0.24055 0.49310 <br />PCA axis 6 -0.09881 0.49592 -0.38436 <br />35367 <br />0 -0.41492 <br />0.39593 <br />Lateral-line scales 0.21902 -0.41333 . <br />omitted <br />Dorsal-fin rays -2.45691 -0.91952 <br />08175 <br />0 0.00905 -0.16599 <br />Anal-fin rays 0.03886 <br />03276 <br />-0 . <br />0.21546 -0.18225 -0.12537 <br />Pectoral-fin rays . <br />01176 <br />-0 0.08675 -0.07120 -0.05523 <br />Pelvic-fin rays . <br />00342 <br />-0 0.12206 -0.05297 -0.19980 <br />Gill rakers . <br />species, being 32.11 ± 2.40 in P. oregonensis and <br />37.27 ± 2.89 in P. umpquae, indicating slight <br />overlap. In general, if only the differences in <br />proportions had been used to distinguish these <br />species, such differences could be viewed as spu- <br />rious, resulting from allometric differences in <br />the individuals sampled. However, the methods <br />used to choose the interorbital width character <br />should ensure that the difference is real. To <br />ascertain the usefulness of this character over <br />the range of size, a linear regression of inter- <br />orbital width and standard length for P. oregon- <br />ensis and P. umpquae was performed, the sample <br />prediction intervals were distinct (Fig. 4), with <br />little overlap. For this regression, five very large <br />individuals of P. oregonensis were eliminated to <br />provide a more readable plot. If the large in- <br />dividuals had been included, the entire plot for <br />P. umpquae would have been compressed into <br />the left quarter of the graph. In all, the inter- <br />orbital width/prepectoral length proportion <br />represented the best single proportion available <br />for confident identification of these two species. <br />Apparent from the regression scatterplot is a <br />polymorphism in morphology between the two <br />samples of P. umpquae from the Umpqua River. <br />The two samples were taken from different <br />streams in the Umpqua drainage, and they were <br />also taken five years apart. Both populations <br />had a nearly perfect linear relationship between <br />the two measurements, clearly separable from <br />P. oregonensis, but the sample of large individ- <br />uals (UCLA W86-4) had a different linear re- <br />lationship than the sample of small individuals <br />(UCLA W81-15). Although there was no rec- <br />ognizable difference in counts or other mor- <br />phological features, these populations deserve <br />further study to evaluate the origin of this vari- <br />ation. <br />Phylogenetic relationships.-Gap-coding of six <br />meristics and 45 proportional measures (Table <br />5) yielded 38 multistate characters. Statistical <br />evaluation of variation between ingroup and <br />outgroup taxa supported the recognition of all <br />six counts, 17 of 18 head proportions, and 15 <br />of 27 body proportions as multistate characters. <br />These characters produced a single Wagner tree <br />(Fig. 5) with a consistency index (CI) of 0.868. <br />General consistency of the different groups of <br />characters demonstrated that counts had a CI <br />of 0.778, head proportions a CI of 0.857, and <br />body proportions a CI of 0.920. We note that <br />those features most easily quantified (meristics) <br />had the lowest CI. Although only a subset of <br />the body proportions contributed useful mul- <br />tistate characters, those that did yielded char- <br />acters of high consistency. A homoplasy matrix <br />for this analysis (Table 6) indicated that most <br />(20 of 28 homoplastic steps) were associated with <br />P. Lucius with nearly half of these between P. <br />Lucius and M. conocephalus. This tree supported <br />the monophyly of the genus Ptychocheilus, and <br />lineages within the genus were supported by <br />multiple synapomorphies (Table 7). These re- <br />sults confirmed the sister-group relationship of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.