Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 2 <br />Consumer surplus estimates for increases in flow for section 3 of the North Fork Feather River <br />in 1981. <br />Consumer surplus <br />Average flow Total <br />(initial): $108,465 <br />20 cfs increase: $109,923 <br />100 cfs increase: $114,137 <br />200 cfs increase: $117,605 <br />strongly significant and all coefficients are <br />of the expected sign. The CREEL and <br />TRAVCOST variables are significant at the <br />5 percent level, while INCOME and IN- <br />Marginal change <br />Net change per cfs <br />$1,458 $72.90 <br />$5,672 $56.72 <br />$9,140 $45.70 <br />TERCEPT are not significant in the TSLS <br />regression. All coefficients estimated for <br />equation (4) are significant at the 5 percent <br />level. <br />BENEFITS OF ADDED INSTREAM FLOW <br />Net economic benefits, or consumer sur- <br />plus, to the anglers are calculated using the <br />TSLS estimate of equation (3). The area un- <br />der this demand curve between the TRAV- <br />COST at the initial level of trips and the <br />maximum observed TRAVCOST (taken as <br />the vertical intercept of the demand equa- <br />tion), is the net willingness to pay, or con- <br />sumer surplus. This integral is approxi- <br />mated through a numerical technique <br />programmed into LOTUS 123. <br />Since the creel census summary for the <br />Rock Creek section (section 3) of the North <br />Fork Feather River estimates that 4,721 to- <br />tal angler trips were taken to that section <br />in 1981, a sample blowup factor of 15 (total <br />angler trips/ estimated angler trips) is used <br />to adjust estimated sample trips and esti- <br />mated sample consumer surplus up to the <br />level of total actual visits and consumer <br />surplus of the site. Table 2 shows the total <br />consumer surplus under existing flow con- <br />ditions is $108,465. This translates into a <br />consumer surplus per trip of $23.00. <br />Table 2 also shows the new consumer <br />surplus when the seasonal average ob- <br />served rate of flow in 1981 (101 cfs) is in- <br />creased by 20 cfs, 100 cfs and 200 cfs. These <br />new benefits are calculated by increasing <br />the FLOW variable in the CREEL equation <br />in Table 1 to predict the new level of <br />CREEL. This new level of CREEL is then <br />inserted into the TCM demand equation to <br />predict the new higher level of trips per <br />capita. The area under this shifted TCM <br />demand equation for a 20 cfs increase is <br />$109,923. Thus, the 20 cfs increase during <br />the season adds $1,458 to angler benefits. <br />This translates into a value of $72.90 per <br />additional cfs. As can be seen in Table 2, <br />the bigger the increase in flow, the larger <br />the total benefits. However, also notice that <br />the value of an additional cfs diminishes <br />as flow is increased more and more. An- <br />glers are willing to pay a great deal for the <br />first increases in flow but less for each in- <br />crement as flow increases. Some functional <br />forms of the demand or value function <br />might result in extremely high flows hav- <br />ing a negative value to anglers. <br />CONCLUSION AND QUALIFICATIONS <br />Our analysis demonstrated that a simple <br />bio-economic system could be estimated <br />using angler origin data. The results in- <br />dicated a statistically significant relation- <br />ship between flow and catch. Given that <br />the angler's demand function is partially <br />a function of fish catch, we derived benefit <br />estimates for changes in streamflow. We <br />think this is an important result because it <br />is based on relating actual visitation data <br />to an actual fish catch-flow relationship. <br />The economic value of instream flow re- <br />ported in this paper is the value to current <br />anglers from the effect of increased flow <br />'N 28 Rivers • Volume 1, Number 1 January 1990