My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7812
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:19:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7812
Author
Many
Title
Rivers, Studies in the Science, Environmental Policy, and Law of Instream Flow
USFW Year
1990
USFW - Doc Type
Rivers
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(1985) have noted, one cannot a priori de- <br />termine the direction of bias in consumer <br />surplus estimates from omitting a variable <br />for substitutes. In addition, if other factors <br />influencing fishing demand on the North <br />Fork of the Feather River were changing <br />over the period studied, they should be <br />reflected by a specific independent vari- <br />able. We are not aware of any significant <br />changes in factors affecting fishing de- <br />mand other than those included in equa- <br />tion (3); therefore, no additional variables <br />have been included. <br />The equation for CREEL is: <br />CREEL, = Bo • FLOW,"' <br />(TRIPS;, / POPJB2 + v,,, (4) <br />where FLOW, is the average discharge <br />downstream of Rock Creek Dam, in <br />cfs, from May to August for the years <br />t = 1981-1985. <br />A positive correlation is expected be- <br />tween the level of river flow and the level <br />of creel. In some respects, equation (4) is a <br />simple production function which quan- <br />tifies the productivity of water in produc- <br />ing harvestable fish. While it may be de- <br />sirable to focus on weekly or monthly flow <br />rather than seasonal average over the five <br />years, we feel the fishery population dur- <br />ing a given season is more influenced by <br />these seasonal flows rather than weekly <br />flows as long as critical flow and temper- <br />ature thresholds are not exceeded. <br />Since CREEL, is a measure of total creel <br />in time t, it is expected that CREEL, is an <br />increasing function of TRIPS;,/POP;,. <br />Hence, there is the possibility of simul- <br />taneity between equations (3) and (4). Es- <br />timated jointly, equations (3) and (4) form <br />a simple, yet powerful, bioeconomic sys- <br />tem. The nonlinear format in equation (4) <br />provided a better fit of the data than a sim- <br />ple linear model, which performed quite <br />poorly. <br />STATISTICAL RESULTS <br />The regression results are presented in <br />Table 1. The results were obtained through <br />the TSP's Version 5.1's nonlinear least <br />squares regression program. At each iter- <br />ation, this quasi-Newton algorithm com- <br />putes the approximate derivatives with re- <br />spect to each of the coefficients. The <br />dependent variable is then regressed on <br />these derivatives. The disturbance term is <br />assumed to be distributed normally. <br />The Two Stage Least Squares (TSLS) es- <br />timation procedure is used to estimate <br />equations (3) and (4) as a system. The TSLS <br />regression results for equation (3) are pre- <br />sented in Table 1. Since the regression es- <br />timates for equation (4) are mainly of in- <br />terest for estimating CREEL, for the TCM <br />demand equation (3), a TSLS regression is <br />not performed for equation (4). However, <br />for informational purposes, Table 1 also <br />presents the nonlinear least squares results <br />for regression (4). Both regressions are <br />TABLE 1 <br />Pooled time-series cross-section regressions for river section 3 of the North Fork of the Feather <br />River. <br />(1) Nonlinear Two Stage Least Squares regression for TRIPS/POP" <br />INTERCEPT TRVCOST INCOME CREEL Adj. rz Log likelihood <br />0.001 -2.772 0.223 1.110 0.76 2,257 <br />(0.12)6 (-19.58) (0.38) (2.52) <br />(2) Nonlinear Least Squares results for CREEL <br />INTERCEPT FLOW TRIP/POP Adj. r2 Log likelihood <br />2,282.291 0.067 0.030 0.232 -21,600 <br />(12.35) (6.34) (7.06) <br />° The number of observations is 285, or 5 years x 57 counties. <br />The t-statistics are in parentheses. <br /> <br />J. Loomis and J. Cooper 27 ??
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.