My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7773
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7773
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:18:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7773
Author
Many
Title
Hydroecologie Appliquee
USFW Year
1993
USFW - Doc Type
2(5)
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hydroecol. Appl. (1993) Tome 5 Vol. 2, pp. 7-26 <br />The Enhancement of Drained Salmonid Rivers <br />in Ireland - A Bioengineering Perspective <br />La mise en valeur des rivieres a saumons Orlande <br />soumises a des captages. Notion de bioingdnierie <br />Martin F. O'Grady, John Curtin <br />Central Fisheries Board, Mobhi Boreen, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland <br />Office of Public Works, Newtown, Trim, Co. Meath, Ireland. <br />Summary. - The authors, a fisheries biologist and drainage engineer have been in- <br />volved in enhancing drained salmonid rivers in Ireland over the last decade. Our objective <br />has been to increase the extent of productive salmon (Salmo salar L.) and trout (Salmo <br />trutta L.) water in rivers which have been subjected to arterial drainage schemes. This <br />paper draws on the experience of the authors to describe, with hindsight, how one <br />should ideally plan such a study from the drainage design phase through to the post- <br />drainage fisheries enhancement programme. <br />Such a programme must be regarded as a bio-engineering exercise if it is to prove <br />successful. Information required in this area will include detail in relation to channel and <br />bank substrate types, a longitudinal profile of all channels, bank heights and hydrographs. <br />In relation to the latter area particular attention should be paid to both peak flood, mean <br />(x) and minimum low flow discharges. <br />The fisheries biologist should ideally compile a detailed ecological profile of the catchment <br />encompassing information on bankside and instream vegetation, macro i nve rtebrate fauna <br />and fish numbers with particular reference to defining the extent to which, and the reasons <br />why, particular channel lenghts function effectively as salmonid spawning, nursery or <br />adult areas. <br />When the drainage scheme is being designed, the biologist, using the aforementioned <br />data base, should examine the proposals, at draft stage, with a view to adjusting same <br />to the advantage of fishery interests. <br />The various ways in which the pre-drainage bio-engineering data base can be used to <br />minimise the impact of drainage and hasten recovery are described. <br />Ideally, post-drainage, most instream physical works designed for fisheries enhancement <br />should not be undertaken for two years after the dredging is completed. The logic for <br />this approach is outlined. <br />Some of the physical enhancement works programmes undertaken by the authors are <br />outlined and their relative success is documented. Collaborative bio-engineering ventures <br />in relation to minimising the ecological impact of drainage design are also discussed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.