|
CALIFORNIA
<br />On February 24, 1944, knowing a specific amount of water was about
<br />to be guaranteed to Mexico and seeing California increase its use of the
<br />river, the Arizona Legislature swung into action. Californians, with
<br />considerable congressional clout, led the fight against approval of an
<br />Arizona-proposed aqueduct to carry water from the Colorado to the
<br />Phoenix area. Arizona sought recourse in the courts.
<br />At the core of the dispute were differing interpretations of
<br />legislation dealing with the flow of the Gila River and the so-called
<br />"surplus" water. When all the dust cleared, California - MWD most
<br />specifically - faced a 662,000 acre-foot reduction once Arizona began
<br />taking its full entitlement. That was more than half of what the district
<br />had contracted for with the federal government.
<br />In April 1945, the timeline shows ratification of the Mexican
<br />Water Treaty. California Senator Hiram Johnson once again was a key
<br />player - this time in futilely battling to kill it. But this clash did result in
<br />one success: it brought together representatives from all seven states in a
<br />common effort to protect their rights. They formed the Colorado River
<br />Water Users Association (CRWUA).
<br />Though Nevadans primarily led the way that first year,
<br />Californians have played an active role the entire 50 years - holding
<br />office, chairing and serving on committees, and generally providing
<br />expertise. Evan T. Hewes, III) board president and chairman of the
<br />Colorado River Board of California (CRB), became a member of
<br />CRWUA's first board of trustees. He moved into the position of
<br />secretary/treasurer in 1951 and vice president for 1952-53. For 1955-56,
<br />Raymond Mathew, CRB chief engineer, took the reins, the first
<br />Californian to become association board president. As the CRWUA
<br />presidency rotates among states, Mathew was followed in 1963-64 and
<br />1974-75 by the same two men who followed him in his position at CRB:
<br />Dallas Cole and Myron Holburt. The last Californian to become president
<br />was MWD board member, Howard Hawkins. At least eight Californians
<br />who are current (1995) CRWUA members have been so for 25 years or
<br />more: Harry Griffen, 31; Myron Holburt, 30; E. Thornton Ibbetson, 29;
<br />Virgil Jones (member board of trustees), 33; Roy Knauft, 29; John Lauten,
<br />28; Roy Mann, 33; and Ray Rummonds (member board of trustees), 34.
<br />The third Californian currently serving on the association's board of
<br />
<br />trustees is MWD
<br />board vice chairman,
<br />James Blake.
<br />In 1995, the
<br />Colorado River
<br />serves some 25
<br />million people, more
<br />than 16 million of
<br />them in Southern
<br />California. It
<br />irrigates more than
<br />1.8 million acres of
<br />land, upward of
<br />650,000 of them in
<br />Southern California.
<br />With a state
<br />CONSTRUCITON OF THE ALL-AMERICAN CANAL GOT apportionment of 4.4
<br />UNDER WAY IN 1934. million acre-feet a
<br />year, plus half of any
<br />surplus water, the Colorado supplies about 65 percent of the water used
<br />south of the Tehachapi Mountains, from the Pacific Ocean to the river.
<br />The MWD region receives about 3 billion kilowatt-hours a year of
<br />electricity from the hydroelectric generating stations on the Colorado.
<br />Though there are other users of Colorado River water in Southern
<br />California, six large public agencies have the major rights to the state's
<br />share of its water and power resources. Allocated on a first-in-time, first-
<br />in-rights basis, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District
<br />and Coachella Valley Water District were in line for the first 3.85 million
<br />acre-feet of water. Metropolitan Water District has the right to the
<br />remaining 550,000, a portion of which is still facing challenge. Rounding
<br />out the six agencies are the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
<br />and the San Diego County Water Authority, both member agencies of
<br />MWD, which receive their water entitlements through that district.
<br />Being near the end of the line at the spigot, MWD took the lead
<br />in seeking creative ways to stretch the supplies and, working cooperatively
<br />with Imperial, Coachella, Palo Verde and the federal government,
<br />developed innovative programs that have been win-win situations. In
<br />1967, MWD, Coachella and Palm Springs' Desert Water Agency devised
<br />the concept of an interagency water effort later followed by a groundwater
<br />storage program. In the late 1980s, after sometimes painfully difficult
<br />negotiations covering more than five years, III) and MWD struck a deal in
<br />which Metropolitan pays for water-saving improvements in Imperial's
<br />system and receives the conserved supplies. For a two-year period in the
<br />early 1990s, about 60 farmers in Palo Verde's service area idled some
<br />20,000 previously producing acres for two years in a test land fallowing
<br />program with MWD. The water that normally would have been used by
<br />PVID farmers was instead "banked" in Lake Mead, making the saved water
<br />available to urban users. Through the efforts of Californians, Congress, in
<br />1988, authorized lining portions of the all-American and Coachella canals
<br />through which more than 93,000 acre-feet of water soaks into the sand
<br />each year. And innovative environmental mitigation programs have gone
<br />hand-in-hand with new construction projects.
<br />In this era where the politics of water is more instrumental than
<br />the engineering, the fertile imaginations of Colorado River water users
<br />throughout Southern California continue to work overtime providing
<br />innovative thinking and creative forces aimed at achieving that which will
<br />become future entries on the Colorado River timeline.
<br />Compiled and written by JoAnn Lundgren, consultant, former senior assistant director
<br />of public affairs, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, and chairman,
<br />CRWWA public affairs committee.
<br />13
<br />WITH THE GREAT DEPRESSION IN FULL SWING, VOTERS IN 1931 AUTHORIZED
<br />$220 MILLION FOR AN AOUEDUCT. PROPOSAL WAS APPROVED BY A NEARLY
<br />5-TO-1 MARGIN.
|