Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Snow Conditions: <br />Snow course conditions were monitored using a compilation of the 23 SNOTEL sites in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin. As indicated by Figure 2, the peak occurred shortly after the snow <br />water equivalent dropped below 10 inches or approximately one month after maximum snow <br />water equivalent occurred. <br />Figure 2 <br /> <br />25.0 <br />20.0 <br />c <br />e <br />W 15.0 <br />L <br />W <br />m <br />3 10.0 <br />0 <br />C <br />N <br />5.0 <br /> <br />Colorado Basin SNOTEL Data <br />0.0 <br />10/1/96 10/31/96 11/30/96 12/30/96 1/29/97 2/28/97 3/29/97 4/28/97 5/28/97 6/27/97 7/27/97 8/26/97 9/25/97 <br /> <br /> <br /> i <br />1 <br />1 <br /> 1} <br /> 1 <br />i <br /> I <br /> J; t <br />1 <br /> I 1 <br />1 <br /> <br />Date <br />Provisional data, subject to change <br />April 1997 Proiect Area Snow Conditions <br />- - Water Year 1997 <br />30 Year Average <br />Snowpack Water Content above Average <br />Snowpack water content on April 1 was 116 percent of the 1966-1995 average throughout the <br />Colorado Big Thompson Project (CBT) watersheds. The Green Mountain watershed was the <br />highest at 129 percent of average. The lowest snowpack water content on the CBT Project was <br />recorded for the Poudre watershed (east slope watershed) at 100 percent of average. <br />Snowpack water content on April 1 was above normal on the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project <br />watersheds. The Upper Arkansas River watershed (east slope) was 127 percent of average. The <br />Fryingpan River watershed was 120 percent of average. <br />Table 1 shows the snowpack update readings from the Natural Resource Conservation Service's <br />automated SNOTEL (SNOwpack TELemetry) sites. This system has replaced many of the <br />manual measurements at remote sites. The period 1961-1990 was used to calculate averages. <br />8