My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9364
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9364
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:11:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9364
Author
Upper Colorado River Recovery Implementation Program.
Title
1997 Coordinated Reservoir Operations Bypasses for Endangered Fish.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />UPPER COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM <br />COORDINATED RESERVOIR OPERATIONS <br />1997 OPERATIONS REPORT <br />1. Introduction <br />The Water Acquisition Committee (WAC) of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish <br />Recovery Program (the Program) proposed the Coordinated Reservoir Operations Study <br />(CROS), in 1994. This is the first year of joint reservoir operations with the reservoir operators <br />[Colorado River Water Conservation District, Denver Water, Northern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District, Southeastern Water Conservancy District, City of Aurora and City of <br />Colorado Springs and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau)], State Engineer's Office (SEO), <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB), the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the <br />National Weather Service (NWS). The objectives were identification and evaluation of potential <br />opportunities to coordinate bypasses of inflows from various reservoirs to enhance habitat in the <br />15-Mile Reach of the Colorado River. These bypasses would likely have passed through the <br />reservoirs during the runoff period. Ccoordinated reservoir operations simply moves those <br />bypasses to the peak of the runoff hydrograph. The focus of this effort is to enhance spring peak <br />flows, which are important to spawning and improvement of aquatic food sources. Coordination <br />and modification of operations were voluntary and occurred within current authorizations and <br />guidelines and without affecting project yields to federal and non-federal reservoirs. <br />The initial study began in March 1995 with the establishment of a core study team representing <br />large reservoir owner/operators and major water management entities in the basin. The first <br />efforts of the team were to clarify the objectives of the study, create a Memorandum of <br />Understanding committing the entities to the study effort, and develop an outline of tasks to <br />guide the direction of the study effort towards a coordinated reservoir operation process. <br />This initial study provided the following: <br />• Analysis of potential operational alternatives <br />• Identification of constraints <br />• Listing of issues to be addressed by the Recovery Implementation Program (RIP) <br />• Process of coordination to enhance flows in the Reach. <br />One of the early efforts of the team was to address creation of a unified accounting system for <br />the Colorado River to account for contributions and facilitate coordination of releases. Current <br />accounting on the river is done in a somewhat fragmented manner between major operating <br />entities. The team is currently developing a unified accounting system with the Water Division 5 <br />Engineer's office and in coordination with the Colorado River Decision Support System <br />(CRDSS) effort to ensure that accounting logic is consistent. <br />Major facilities with potential for coordination have been identified and a list of parameters <br />influencing their operations has been assembled. These parameters include physical and <br />operational parameters, traditional operations, current commitments, and authorization, <br />organizational and legal guidelines for the facilities. This effort has helped define the <br />institutional boundaries and constraints on coordination and discretionary operations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.