Laserfiche WebLink
117 WHERE TO NOW? <br />presently being funded by the <br />Agricultural Research Service. <br />Additional research support is being <br />provided by the CSRS through <br />several Western State agricultural <br />experiment stations. Progress is <br />being made through research efforts <br />and demonstration sites within the <br />Grand Valley and Uinta Basin <br />implementation projects. <br />effectiveness of the salinity control <br />practices being applied. In the Big <br />Sandy, Lower Gunnison, McElmo, <br />and Moapa Valley projects, M&E <br />plans have been prepared and are in <br />the early phases of implementation. <br />WHERE TO NOW? <br />Monitoring and Evaluation <br />SCS is responsible for developing <br />and implementing a monitoring and <br />evaluation (M&E) plan in each of <br />the USDA salinity projects. The <br />primary objectives of these plans are <br />to: <br />• Assess the effectiveness of <br />program implementation on <br />reducing salt loading to the <br />Colorado River, <br />• Monitor the impacts of <br />implementation on wetlands <br />and wildlife habitat values; and <br />• Determine the costs and <br />economic effects of program <br />implementation. <br />SCS, with assistance from others, <br />carries out its M&E responsibilities <br />as an integral part of the CRSC <br />program. <br />Monitoring and evaluation <br />activities have been underway in <br />the Grand Valley and Uinta Basin <br />for several years. Valuable infor- <br />mation is being obtained in these <br />projects on the costs, impacts, and <br />The Evaluation Process <br />USDA and Interior will continue <br />to use the annual joint evaluation <br />process. Using a budget and least <br />cost investment computer model, <br />the evaluation process will deter- <br />mine the optimal combination of <br />projects and construction timing <br />necessary to meet salt load <br />reduction goals at minimum costs. <br />This process provides a program <br />management tool to support <br />accomplishment of salinity control <br />objectives at overall maximum cost <br />effectiveness. This approach to <br />long-term, program-wide analysis is <br />helpful to Federal program <br />managers when weighing the many <br />budget choices each year. <br />Based on the analysis, it appears <br />that total remaining construction <br />costs for the program to meet the <br />numeric criteria and required salt <br />load reduction are now projected to <br />be about $530 million (1988 price <br />level). <br />A repayment analysis model has <br />also been developed to evaluate the <br />ability of the Lower Colorado River <br />Basin Fund to repay its share of the <br />total program costs. For the