Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. RECOVERY FACILITY DESIGN <br /> <br />The operational requirements for the proposed facility are complex in relation to traditional <br />fish hatcheries due to the unique constraints of working with rare and endangered fish <br />stocks. An overriding concern in developing a facility design was the high degree of risk <br />associated with artificial propagation of endangered stocks at critically low population levels. <br />This problem is compounded because the facility will be receiving and releasing fish that <br />may be genetically unique, from multiple sources and watersheds. These factors necessitate <br />that all practical measures are taken to protect fish health and guard against disease <br />outbreaks and transfer among various populations. Potential disease threats to each of the <br />four species have been reviewed, so that features which will minimize the threats to fish <br />health can be incorporated in the facility design. Other design characteristics which must <br />be emphasized, due to the unique character of endangered fish species culture, are methods <br />which will minimize or eliminate predation, escapement and theft or vandalism. Genetic <br />segregation, as well as the quality and quantity of water available, have been given high <br />priority with a resulting marked influence on design. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The purposes of the proposed propagation facility, broodstock and refugia holding facility, <br />and research facility, which are cumulatively referred to as the recovery facility, are to meet <br />the endangered fish recovery goals of propagation of endangered fishes, augmentation of <br />native populations, refugia and broodstock holding and to provide facilities for research. <br />During the initial development of the scope of work, the CWCB staff selected, for the <br />purposes of this study, a range of hatchery production goals for each species. These <br />production scenarios, for each species, are as follows: Scenario 1 - 150,000 fish per year, <br />Scenario 2 - 300,000 fish per year and Scenario 3 - 600,000 fish per year. These production <br />goals were estimated to meet the needs of both augmentation and research and were <br />selected because there was no firm estimate of the number of fish needed for the recovery <br />program. <br /> <br />The original scope of the design phase of the study was to prepare a recovery facility design <br />for each of the three highest ranked sites. This design concept was later modified because <br />the three sites with the highest rankings were similar sites located in the same geographic <br />region, the San Luis Valley of the Rio Grande Basin, which is outside of the native habitat <br />of the four endangered fish. The high rankings for these sites resulted primarily from <br />availability of naturally occurring high temperature (700 to 118'F) groundwater, that is <br />preferred for spawning and growth and offers a significant cost advantage over heating a <br />cold water supply. However, to provide for greater flexibility in the ultimate selection of <br />a hatchery site, the CWCB staff, with agreement of the T AC, decided to revise the study <br />scope and prepare feasibility level designs for each of the for three types of water sources: <br />warm groundwater, cold groundwater and surface water. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The three different production quantities of 150,000, 300,000, and 600,000 fish of each <br />species, as specified by the scope of work, were considered for each of the water supply <br />types. A total of nine design scenarios were developed, including an estimation of <br /> <br />8 <br />