Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />-3- <br /> <br />2- Many of the recent problems with this organization's dissatisfaction <br />as to role and accomplishments is that the Council has no way to <br />successfully cope with continuity or follow-through. CRWC business <br />automatically falls to every agencies' lowest business priority.. <br />. Directors, Technical representatives, committee chairman or the secretary <br />have not been able to follow through on any issue because of their normal <br />professional workload. Council and technical members only rarely <br />accomplish their normal other workloads, and can't do anything but swipe <br />at a Council item before another professional assignment consumes their <br />attention. Therefore, the Council business is done in fits and starts. <br />The Council needs someone who can devote the necessary time to be in <br />constant contact with committee chairmen; handle and transmit developing <br />issues; make sure the directors get in touch with each other and <br />follow-up; coordinate with secretaries of WAFWA, Water Users, American <br />Fisheries Society and federal cooperators; get correspondence out in a <br />timely manner throughout the year; be available to represent the <br />directors at other CRWC meetings and perhaps other organizations' <br />meetings; act as a clearinghouse for inter-organization business and <br />timely dissemination of intra-business; and get exposure in press and <br />other conservation fields. The special committee recommends a <br />single-purpose secretary, probably paid on an hourly rate, so that <br />Council duties could be separated from professional agency duties. <br />Addition of a part-time paid secretary to accomplish the job objectives <br />delineated above, when super-imposed on the present operations of the Council, <br />could be expected to raise annual costs to approximately $13,000-$17,000. If <br />the Council wishes to further consider this approach, more detailed estimates <br />of time and costs should be developed. <br />Following Mr. Stone's report and discussion, the Council took the following <br />actions with unanimous consensus. <br />a. Continue consideration of becoming an appropriate part of the Colorado <br />River Water Users Association to meet with them and become the spokes <br />organization for wildlife along the river. <br />L <br />B <br />b. Establish a contract with Rod Stone to: 1) acquire information on the <br />Colorado River Water Users organization - its funding, membership, table of <br />organization, subcommittee structure and objectives - with the objective of <br />looking at CRWC becoming an appropriate conjunctive of the association; 2) <br />obtain the necessary detail to expand a preliminary budget for a paid CRWC <br />secretary; 3) continue to investigate possible other sources of financial <br />support for CRWC, utilizing a paid secretary; 4) identify current and <br />potential significant wildlife issues effecting each or all of the seven basin <br />states and/or which the Colorado River Water Users organization may have on <br />their agenda. <br />r