Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />West, to operate these Colorado Basin features to optimize the management of <br />those systems and not because we're thinking about only one thing; instead, <br />to find some way to do them all in the best way and it was hoped that the <br />. Bureau of Reclamation would be willing to listen to wildlife agencies as one <br />advocate of one of the key parts of the system. <br />BUSINESS SESSION <br />A. Council Travel in Administrative Funding Proposal <br />Mr. Stone indicated the major amount of travel request was for the executive <br />secretary travel to meetings of the sub-units of the council such as the <br />technical committee and also travel to the council meetings as called or <br />needed. The second need was travel to other organizations, such as national <br />water users organizations, or the Western Irrigators Conference, with the <br />message or for business of the council, or perhaps coordinating in other <br />industry conferences. Another component of the travel request was for <br />members of the technical committee and subcommittees which on many occasions <br />are unable to be supported by their agency and need to travel to conduct <br />CRFWC business. This would be especially important in the future as business <br />interests and issues of the council expand, making necessary more technical <br />expertise and time. It was discussed that the point was well taken, because <br />often council agencies were not able to support travel out of state given the <br />current justification, but could support the council. <br />Motion that the council proceed to seek the source of funding from D-J <br />administrative funds as outlined by the proposal and that the council look as <br />the first item of reduction, if needed, the entire amount in committee <br />travel. Motion carried unanimously. <br />B. Revised Council Articles of Association. <br />Motion to accept the Articles of Association (bylaws) as recommended by the <br />technical committee ar}d accept the title change to the Colorado River Fish & <br />Wildlife Council. Motion carried unanimously. The articles are presented as <br />Appendix I. <br />C. Standing Committee Status of Wildlife-Habitat Committee. <br />Fred Worthy presented a motion to change the wildlife committee from the ad <br />hoc committee proposal in the technical report to the status of a full <br />standing committee. Following a second, Mr. Worthly indicated his thinking <br />of the council's need to add that emphasis to the habitat and wildlife <br />aspects of the Colorado River Wildlife Council and to clarifying his motion <br />. that he was thinking primarily in terms of committee action on terrestrial <br />riparian systems. Ron Powell indicated he would like clarification from the <br />council on a charge for this committee. In the past, it has largely <br />continued to make status reports and not have a definitive objective. Some <br />members want to send a message to biologists that the council consider the <br />habitat program as important as fisheries and that there is a major push, <br />. particularly from mitigation and coordinated planning, that wildlife is <br />critically important and needs to be recognized in the bylaws and also, that <br />wildlife interests along the river need support. California has just listed <br />three species of special concern. <br />0 <br />15