My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6047
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:49:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6047
Author
Colorado River Wildlife Council.
Title
Minutes, Colorado River Fish & Wildlife Council.
USFW Year
1983.
USFW - Doc Type
April 4-5, 1983.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
motion, which carried unanimously when the vote was called. <br />Nutrients in the Colorado River - Fred called attention to the report given <br />last year at the Council meeting and again in February by Dr. Larry Paulsen <br />and Vic Lambo. He said it was an excellent report which brought out that <br />the reduction of phorphorus has had an effect on clorophyl, which is a <br />primary productivity measurement. <br />Fred said Mr. Lambo was present and would be willing to answer questions and <br />lead a discussion, if anyone wished. <br />There being no questions, the Committee's recommendation was for the Council <br />to either reaffirm the existing resolution (Resolution No. III of the Council <br />meeting of April 5-6, 1982) or take a stronger position. <br />Discussion followed. It was pointed out that the existing resolution did <br />not specify whether or not it was directed to primary or secondary standards. <br />John Peters said he was no expert on the clean water act, but he believed <br />secondary standards dealt with fish and wildlife resources. He thought the <br />group should focus on one thing specifically, and find out what the issues <br />are. The Council is not concerned with drinking water or agricultural concerns. <br />Rod Stone suggested the resolution be given to the Resolutions Committee <br />and let them go over it to see if they could come up with a suggestion <br />' for action. If that isn't successful, then the Council can ask the <br />Technical Committee to take another look. <br />Grass carp - Upper Basin states are concerned that regulations prohibiting <br />importation of grass carp may not have been enforced. Resolution No. II <br />of the 1982 Council meeting pertained to grass carp hatcheries and impor- <br />tation of them. <br />At the conclusion of the discussion, it was decided that an inventory might <br />be a starting point, then the Council would know where the grass carp and <br />tilapia are found, and include the feasibility of managing these species. <br />Will Molini made the motion, seconded by Joe White and carred unanimously. <br />Prohibited and Protected Committee - Jim St. Amant reported to the Tech- <br />nical Committee. For specifics, refer to Exhibit B. <br />Endemic Species Committee - Wayne Gustaveson reported to the Technical <br />Committee. For specifics, refer to Exhibit B. <br />Striped Bass Committee Chairman Butch Padilla reported to the Technical <br />Committee. For details refer to Exhibit B. <br />Jim St. Amant, Chairman of the P and P Committee discussed the possibility <br />of the introduction of another forage species, and felt it would add to <br />the problem, until a solution of the low nutrient level of the river is <br />resolved. <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.