My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7999
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:48:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7999
Author
Colorado River Wildlife Council.
Title
Minutes, Colorado River Fish & Wildlife Council.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
April 23-24, 1996.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />ill <br />so that it can be circulated for outside review. USBR w <br />make final comments to FWS on the biological opinion which <br />then should become official about April, 1997. <br />In discussion among the group, FWS indicated they have <br />been working in phase with USBR during development and will <br />continue as comments are returned to USBR during the public <br />review process. The situation regarding various <br />environmental groups is clouded. It is speculated that most <br />environmental groups will concur with the public <br />dissemination and comment methodology. There are some <br />groups, however, such as the Southwest Center for <br />Biodiversity which appear to be entirely against the process <br />and may take positions which could delay the final <br />assessment. It will become a matter of just how far FWS can <br />go for one or two organizations to reach unanimous <br />conclusions. If it appears this is impossible, the process <br />will likely go forward as indicated and see what happens. <br />LOWER BASIN NATIVE FISH WORK GROUP <br />Tom Burke (USBR) provided an overview of the <br />accomplishments and objectives of the lower basin fish work <br />group. The group has been primarily focused on the humpback <br />chub and razorback sucker that were captured in the original <br />impoundment of reservoirs. Data show large numbers of <br />native fish remained in the reservoirs--large numbers <br />showing in spawning aggregations, areas of habitat and <br />recovery from angling. Over the years, these populations <br />have lost individuals until they are present only in small <br />numbers of old age fish. Professionals feel that without <br />recruitment of young these populations will become smaller <br />until, perhaps shortly after the turn of the century, they <br />phase out of the picture. In Lake Mojave, genetics research <br />confirms that the number of individuals are still sufficient <br />to create wide genetic diversity. <br /> <br />The fish work group is primarily composed of <br />individuals from various government and private agencies <br />believing they can volunteer and provide a recovery or <br />conservation technique for the Mojave razorback sucker. The <br />group works by donating individual time, equipment and <br />possession. There are no records of the individual group <br />members' contribution in time or equipment; however, the <br />USBR carries a budget item of $125,000 per year for the work <br />group to maintain the program. <br />The group is not a clearinghouse nor the official focus of <br />any other broad based programs, but specifically to carry <br />forward a technique on Lake Mojave whose objective is to <br />replace the adult population of razorback suckers with a <br />genetically diverse new generation. As Lake Mojave has a <br />quite predictable 15 foot annual fluctuation, the group has <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.