My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7999
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:48:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7999
Author
Colorado River Wildlife Council.
Title
Minutes, Colorado River Fish & Wildlife Council.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
April 23-24, 1996.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />t <br />process seems to be agreeable to some groups; however, <br />others have indicated they will not accept the process and <br />will continue legal efforts to negate agreements and <br />understandings. It is now USBR's intent to continue to <br />pursue assessment of their activities and submit it for <br />Section 7 biological assessment by June. The time line for <br />the FWS to render a biological opinion is to have a draft <br />opinion by December of this year and a final by <br />approximately April 1997. This, of course, has extended the <br />time for development of the Multi-Species Conservation Plan <br />Program. The notices of intent to sue, while not appearing <br />biologically strong, will nevertheless keep the agencies and <br />courts busy for a considerable amount of time. The major <br />cause of the suit seems to be disagreement with the process. <br />Among other things they allege the FWS should be standing <br />apart and directing the other entities rather than entering <br />into an agreement on a partnership basis. <br />The Multi-Species Group is also continuing to devise a <br />process for funding with an expanded basis of participants. <br />This may involve a greater emphasis from other Department of <br />Interior agencies, i.e., National Park Service, Indian <br />Tribes, etc. The FWS has made the commitment to provide one <br />individual full-time to coordinate all the current <br />activities. The partners in the original Multi-Species <br />Conservation Plan were advised that a draft of the <br />Memorandum of Clarification would soon be available. <br />LOWER BASIN OPERATIONS <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br /> <br />P <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />A report of U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) <br />activities on the Colorado River system was presented by Mr. <br />Tom Burke and Mr. Tom Shrader USBR, Boulder, NV. Ongoing <br />routine operations by USBR have been described for <br />biological assessment under Section 7, MANED. The document <br />basically describes operations at Hoover, Davis, and Parker <br />Dams and the storage and release of approximately 9 million <br />acre feet of water annually. It also covers routing <br />maintenance of riverbanks, jetties, dikes channelization, <br />and other works. The description also includes endangered <br />species conservation measures within their operational <br />scheme. The razorback sucker and a number of aquatic plant <br />species enter into operation and maintenance modes by virtue <br />of USBR programs and objectives, particularly in certain <br />areas of backwater along the mainstem and in wildlife <br />refuges. USBR is currently asking for public and other <br />agency input into the statement of operations. Following <br />the outside comment which will close on May 15th, USBR will <br />finalize the assessment and submit it to FWS by mid-June. <br />However, after receiving the draft assessment back from FWS <br />in about mid-November, USBR plans to ask the service for an <br />extension of the final opinion for an additional four months <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.