Laserfiche WebLink
<br />think we are talking about isolated problems. I do not think we can <br />afford to question each specific situation. <br />I want to convey that endangered species are just the tip of a <br />much larger problem. This larger problem is the loss of biological <br />di versi ty. It is very easy to tri vialize the importance of any <br />particular species. The original title for this talk did that in a <br />way. Who cares about some stupid fish? I hope no one thought I was <br />going to tell them that Squawfish are worth $99.00 per pound. You <br />cannot place a monetary value on these things. <br />Therefore, when addressing controversial endangered species <br />issues, we must not lose sight of the fact that it is the tip of a <br />much larger problem that we all have to deal with. <br />It is important to reiterate why we care about these issues. <br />While sentiment and nature appreciation are fine qualities, there are <br />utilitarian reasons to be concerned with endangered species and the <br />loss of biodiversity. <br /> <br />Environmental services <br />We are all part of an environment which provides our basic life <br />requirements. I do not think many people appreciate that the <br />habitability of this environment is dependent upon the temperature, <br />moisture and oxygen available. Those are the products of a living, <br />physical, chemical system, as well as of living organisms. Prior to <br />the emergence of life on earth the atmosphere was very different. It <br />contained only very small traces of oxygen. Our ability to live here <br />is a property that is not only physical and chemical, but also <br />biological. Many people simplify the system by saying a plant is a <br />plant, an animal is an animal, a microbe is a microbe, and if we lived <br />in a world of rice patties, wood lots and pastures we would still be <br />have enough oxygen. There would still be rainfall. The machinery <br />would keep going. That maybe true, we do not know. <br />However, ecologists are skeptical that a very simplified world <br />would function well. The reason why is because of something we call <br />ecological services. This theory suggests that not only does every <br />variety of life playa role in maintaining the overall environment, <br />regardless of how significant, they also playa role in the ecology <br />of the community that they are in. A good example are honey bees and <br />pollination. The possibility of African bees migrating into the <br />United States from Mexico is a threat to our apiary industry. Many <br />crops require insect mediated pollination. Without bees those crops <br />are lost. This is only one example. Consider the approximately <br />thirty million species on earth and all their interconnections. There <br />are serious reasons to believe that by diminishing the overall <br />diversity of the system, connections are diminished and the remaining <br />parts are at risk. The ramifications are unknown, but we have to be <br />aware of the possibilities. <br /> <br />Commercial goods <br />. Obviously, all our food comes from living things. By and large, <br />they are cultivated living things. I do not think many people realize <br />that since 1930 there has been a tremendous increase in per unit <br />agricultural productivity in this country. The yield of wheat from <br />an acre, or the yield of potatoes from an acre have dramatically <br />increased. Most people associate those increases with technology and <br /> <br />83 <br />